Question 1

Urban & Shared Mobility

Annick Roetynck · Accepted Answer

2023

Abouelela, M., Chaniotakis, E., and Antoniou, C. (2023). Understanding the landscape of shared-e-scooters in North America; Spatiotemporal analysis and policy insights. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103602.
Bach, X., Marquet, O., and Miralles-Guasch, C. (2023). Assessing social and spatial access equity in regulatory frameworks for moped-style scooter sharing services. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.002.
Choi, S.E., Kim, J., and Seo, D. (2023). Travel patterns of free-floating e-bike-sharing users before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104065.
Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Pamucar, D., Chen, Y., and Coffman, D. (2023). Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based RAFSI model. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104426.
Echeverría-Su, M., Huamanraime-Maquin, E., Cabrera, F.I., and Vázquez-Rowe, I. (2023). Transitioning to sustainable mobility in Lima, Peru. Are e-scooter sharing initiatives part of the problem or the solution?. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161130.
Klein, N., Brown, A., and Thigpen, C. (2023). Clutter and Compliance: Scooter Parking Interventions and Perceptions. Active Travel Studies. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.1196.
Liu, S., Zhang, F., Ji, Y., Ma, X,. et al. (2023). Understanding spatial-temporal travel demand of private and shared e-bikes as a feeder mode of metro stations. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136602.
Reis, A.F., Baptista, P., and Moura, F (2023). How to promote the environmental sustainability of shared e-scooters: A life-cycle analysis based on a case study from Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100044.
Savastano, M., Suciu, M-C., Gorelova, I., and Stativă, G-A. (2023). How smart is mobility in smart cities? An analysis of citizens' value perceptions through ICT applications. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104071.
Sobrino, N., Gonzalez, J.N., Vassallo, J.M., and de los Angeles Baeza, M. (2023). Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.02.009.
Yan, X., Zhao, X., Broaddus, A., et al. (2023). Evaluating shared e-scooters’ potential to enhance public transit and reduce driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103640.
Yin, R., and He, J. (2023). Design of a photovoltaic electric bike battery-sharing system in public transit stations. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120505.
Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Hem B., and Yang, L. (2023). Mode substitution and carbon emission impacts of electric bike sharing systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104312.

2022

Angelelli, E., Chiari, M., Mor, A., Speranza, M.G. (2022). A simulation framework for a station-based bike-sharing system. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108489.
Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips - Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
Chicco, A. and Diana, M. (2022). Understanding micro-mobility usage patterns: a preliminary comparison between dockless bike sharing and e-scooters in the city of Turin (Italy). Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
Coretti Sanchez, N., Martinez, I., Alonso Pastor, L., and Larson, K. (2022). On the performance of shared autonomous bicycles: A simulation study. Communications in Transportation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100066.
Fan, Z., and Harper, C.D. (2022). Congestion and environmental impacts of short car trip replacement with micromobility modes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103173.
Gebhardt, L., Ehrenberger, S., Wolf, C., and Cyganski, R. (2022). Can shared E-scooters reduce CO2 emissions by substituting car trips in Germany? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103328.
Jiageng, N., Lanlan, Z., and Xianghong, L. (2022). A study on the trip behavior of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Chinese universities based on NL model - Henan Polytechnic University as an example. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127855.
Jiao, J., Lee, H.K., and Choi, S.J. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849.
Krauss, K., Krail, M. and Axhausen, K. W. (2022). What drives the utility of shared transport services for urban travellers? A stated preference survey in German cities. Travel behaviour and society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010.
Krier, C., Dablanc, L., Aguiléra, A., and Louvet, N. (2022). Sharing within the gig economy: The use of shared e-bikes by on-demand platform-based instant meal delivery workers in Paris. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.012.
Leurent, F. (2022). What is the value of swappable batteries for a shared e-scooter service? Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100843.
Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
Liu, H-C., Lin, J-J. (2022). Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.012.
Li, H., Yuan, Z., and Novack, T., et al. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
Ma, Q., Xin, Y., Yang, H., and Xie, K. (2022). Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103376.
Martin, R., and Xu, Y. (2022). Is tech-enhanced bikeshare a substitute or complement for public transit? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.007.
Mouratidis, K. (2022). Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104161.
Shao, Q., Zhang, W., Cao, X., and Yang J. (2022). Nonlinear and interaction effects of land use and motorcycles/E-bikes on car ownership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103115.
Sun, S. and Ertz, M. (2022). Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from urban transportation big data. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104045.
Teixeira, J. F., Silva, C., and Moura e Sá, M. (2022). The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users’ motivations during COVID-19. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026.
Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., and Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468.
Xiao, G., Xiao, Y., Ni, A., Zhang, C., and Zong, F. (2022). Exploring influence mechanism of bikesharing on the use of public transportation — a case of Shanghai. Transportation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2093287.
Xu, M., Di, Y., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Designing van-based mobile battery swapping and rebalancing services for dockless ebike-sharing systems based on the dueling double deep Q-network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103620.
Yang, X., Xu, Y., Zhou, Y., Song, S., and Wu, Y. (2022). Demand-aware mobile bike-sharing service using collaborative computing and information fusion in 5G IoT environment. Digital Communications and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2022.06.004.
Yang, H., Zheng, R., Li, X., et al. (2022). Nonlinear and threshold effects of the built environment on e-scooter sharing ridership. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103453.
Zhou, X., Ji, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, F., and An, Q. (2022). Spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of commuting by shared electric bike: A case study of Ningbo, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132337.
Zhu, Z., and Lu, C. (2022). Life cycle assessment of shared electric bicycle on greenhouse gas emissions in China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160546

2021

Brand, C., Dons, E., Anaya-Boig, Avila-Palencia, I., et al. (2021). The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102764.
Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, J., and Cheng, L. (2021). What factors influence ridership of station-based bike sharing and free-floating bike sharing at rail transit stations?. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1872121.
Cities Multimodal, Interreg Baltic Sea Region, & European Regional Development Fund (2021). Toolbox for Mobility Management. Eltis, The Urban Mobility Observatory. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/trainingmaterials/tr_toolbox_layout_v19.pdf.
Clean Cities& YouGov. (2021). What European city-dwellers want from their mayors post-Covid – Survey. https://cleancitiescampaign.org/2021/05/04/what-city-dwellers-want-from-their-mayors-post-covid/.
Cottell, J., Connelly, K., and Harding, C. (2021). Micromobility in London. Centre for London. Micromobility_in_London_Report.pdf (centreforlondon.org).
Dev Mukku, V., Haj Salah, I. and Assmann, T. (2021). Simulation Testbed for the next-generation Bike-Sharing System with Self-driving Cargo-Bikes. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.129.
European Parliament, TRAN-committee. (2021). Sustainable and smart urban transport. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2021/652233/IPOL_ATA(2021)652233_EN.pdf.
Frias-Martinez, V., Sloate, E., Manglunia, H., and Wu, J. (2021). Causal effect of low-income areas on shared dockless e-scooter use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103038.
Fukushige, T., Fitch, T. D., and Handy, S. (2021). Factors influencing dock-less E-bike-share mode substitution: Evidence from Sacramento, California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102990.
Fung, C. M., McArthur, D. P., and Hong, J. (2021). Examining the effects of a temporary subway closure on cycling in Glasgow using bike-sharing data. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.06.002.
Guo, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Understanding factors influencing shared e-scooter usage and its impact on auto mode substitution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102991.
Hosseinzadeh, Karimpour and Kluger (2021). Factors influencing shared micromobility services: An analysis of e-scooters and bikeshare. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103047.
Hu, J-W., and Creutzig, F. (2021). A systematic review on shared mobility in China. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1879974.
Latinopoulos, C., Patrier, A., and Sivakumar, A. (2021). Planning for e-scooter use in metropolitan cities: A case study for Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103037.
Lipovsky, C. (2021). Free-floating electric scooters: representation in French mainstream media. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1809752.
Maltese, I., Gatta, V., and Marcucci, E. (2021). Active Travel in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. An Italian overview. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100621.
Rejali, S., Aghabayk, K., Mohammadi, A., and Shiwakoti, N. (2021). Assessing a priori acceptance of shared dockless e-scooters in Iran. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103042.
Sadeghinasr, B. et al. (2021). Mining dockless bikeshare data for insights into cyclist behaviour and preferences: Evidence from the Boston region. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103044.
Tan, X., Zhu, X., Li, Q., Li, L., and Chen, J. (2021). Tidal phenomenon of the dockless bike-sharing system and its causes: the case of Beijing. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1871129.
Yang, Y., Jiang, L., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Tourists on shared bikes: Can bike-sharing boost attraction demand? Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104328.
Zhao, Y., and Ke, J. (2021). The impact of shared mobility services on housing values near subway stations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103097.

2020

Dill, J., and McNeil, N. (2020). Are Shared Vehicles Shared by All? A Review of Equity and Vehicle Sharing. Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220966732.
Hosseinzadeh, A., Algomaiah, M., Kluger, R., and Li, Z. (2020). E-scooters and Sustainability: Investigating the Relationship between the Density of E-Scooter Trips and Characteristics of Sustainable Urban Development. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624.
Lozzi, G., Rodrigues, M., Marcucci, E., Teoh, T., Gatta, V., and Pacelli, V. (2020). Research for TRAN Committee – COVID-19 and urban mobility: impacts and perspectives, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_IDA(2020)652213.

Question 2

Urban & Shared Mobility

Annick Roetynck · Accepted Answer

2023

Abouelela, M., Chaniotakis, E., and Antoniou, C. (2023). Understanding the landscape of shared-e-scooters in North America; Spatiotemporal analysis and policy insights. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103602.
Bach, X., Marquet, O., and Miralles-Guasch, C. (2023). Assessing social and spatial access equity in regulatory frameworks for moped-style scooter sharing services. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.002.
Choi, S.E., Kim, J., and Seo, D. (2023). Travel patterns of free-floating e-bike-sharing users before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104065.
Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Pamucar, D., Chen, Y., and Coffman, D. (2023). Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based RAFSI model. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104426.
Echeverría-Su, M., Huamanraime-Maquin, E., Cabrera, F.I., and Vázquez-Rowe, I. (2023). Transitioning to sustainable mobility in Lima, Peru. Are e-scooter sharing initiatives part of the problem or the solution?. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161130.
Klein, N., Brown, A., and Thigpen, C. (2023). Clutter and Compliance: Scooter Parking Interventions and Perceptions. Active Travel Studies. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.1196.
Liu, S., Zhang, F., Ji, Y., Ma, X,. et al. (2023). Understanding spatial-temporal travel demand of private and shared e-bikes as a feeder mode of metro stations. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136602.
Reis, A.F., Baptista, P., and Moura, F (2023). How to promote the environmental sustainability of shared e-scooters: A life-cycle analysis based on a case study from Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100044.
Savastano, M., Suciu, M-C., Gorelova, I., and Stativă, G-A. (2023). How smart is mobility in smart cities? An analysis of citizens' value perceptions through ICT applications. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104071.
Sobrino, N., Gonzalez, J.N., Vassallo, J.M., and de los Angeles Baeza, M. (2023). Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.02.009.
Yan, X., Zhao, X., Broaddus, A., et al. (2023). Evaluating shared e-scooters’ potential to enhance public transit and reduce driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103640.
Yin, R., and He, J. (2023). Design of a photovoltaic electric bike battery-sharing system in public transit stations. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120505.
Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Hem B., and Yang, L. (2023). Mode substitution and carbon emission impacts of electric bike sharing systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104312.

2022

Angelelli, E., Chiari, M., Mor, A., Speranza, M.G. (2022). A simulation framework for a station-based bike-sharing system. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108489.
Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips - Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
Chicco, A. and Diana, M. (2022). Understanding micro-mobility usage patterns: a preliminary comparison between dockless bike sharing and e-scooters in the city of Turin (Italy). Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
Coretti Sanchez, N., Martinez, I., Alonso Pastor, L., and Larson, K. (2022). On the performance of shared autonomous bicycles: A simulation study. Communications in Transportation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100066.
Fan, Z., and Harper, C.D. (2022). Congestion and environmental impacts of short car trip replacement with micromobility modes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103173.
Gebhardt, L., Ehrenberger, S., Wolf, C., and Cyganski, R. (2022). Can shared E-scooters reduce CO2 emissions by substituting car trips in Germany? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103328.
Jiageng, N., Lanlan, Z., and Xianghong, L. (2022). A study on the trip behavior of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Chinese universities based on NL model - Henan Polytechnic University as an example. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127855.
Jiao, J., Lee, H.K., and Choi, S.J. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849.
Krauss, K., Krail, M. and Axhausen, K. W. (2022). What drives the utility of shared transport services for urban travellers? A stated preference survey in German cities. Travel behaviour and society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010.
Krier, C., Dablanc, L., Aguiléra, A., and Louvet, N. (2022). Sharing within the gig economy: The use of shared e-bikes by on-demand platform-based instant meal delivery workers in Paris. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.012.
Leurent, F. (2022). What is the value of swappable batteries for a shared e-scooter service? Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100843.
Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
Liu, H-C., Lin, J-J. (2022). Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.012.
Li, H., Yuan, Z., and Novack, T., et al. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
Ma, Q., Xin, Y., Yang, H., and Xie, K. (2022). Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103376.
Martin, R., and Xu, Y. (2022). Is tech-enhanced bikeshare a substitute or complement for public transit? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.007.
Mouratidis, K. (2022). Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104161.
Shao, Q., Zhang, W., Cao, X., and Yang J. (2022). Nonlinear and interaction effects of land use and motorcycles/E-bikes on car ownership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103115.
Sun, S. and Ertz, M. (2022). Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from urban transportation big data. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104045.
Teixeira, J. F., Silva, C., and Moura e Sá, M. (2022). The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users’ motivations during COVID-19. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026.
Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., and Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468.
Xiao, G., Xiao, Y., Ni, A., Zhang, C., and Zong, F. (2022). Exploring influence mechanism of bikesharing on the use of public transportation — a case of Shanghai. Transportation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2093287.
Xu, M., Di, Y., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Designing van-based mobile battery swapping and rebalancing services for dockless ebike-sharing systems based on the dueling double deep Q-network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103620.
Yang, X., Xu, Y., Zhou, Y., Song, S., and Wu, Y. (2022). Demand-aware mobile bike-sharing service using collaborative computing and information fusion in 5G IoT environment. Digital Communications and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2022.06.004.
Yang, H., Zheng, R., Li, X., et al. (2022). Nonlinear and threshold effects of the built environment on e-scooter sharing ridership. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103453.
Zhou, X., Ji, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, F., and An, Q. (2022). Spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of commuting by shared electric bike: A case study of Ningbo, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132337.
Zhu, Z., and Lu, C. (2022). Life cycle assessment of shared electric bicycle on greenhouse gas emissions in China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160546

2021

Brand, C., Dons, E., Anaya-Boig, Avila-Palencia, I., et al. (2021). The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102764.
Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, J., and Cheng, L. (2021). What factors influence ridership of station-based bike sharing and free-floating bike sharing at rail transit stations?. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1872121.
Cities Multimodal, Interreg Baltic Sea Region, & European Regional Development Fund (2021). Toolbox for Mobility Management. Eltis, The Urban Mobility Observatory. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/trainingmaterials/tr_toolbox_layout_v19.pdf.
Clean Cities& YouGov. (2021). What European city-dwellers want from their mayors post-Covid – Survey. https://cleancitiescampaign.org/2021/05/04/what-city-dwellers-want-from-their-mayors-post-covid/.
Cottell, J., Connelly, K., and Harding, C. (2021). Micromobility in London. Centre for London. Micromobility_in_London_Report.pdf (centreforlondon.org).
Dev Mukku, V., Haj Salah, I. and Assmann, T. (2021). Simulation Testbed for the next-generation Bike-Sharing System with Self-driving Cargo-Bikes. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.129.
European Parliament, TRAN-committee. (2021). Sustainable and smart urban transport. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2021/652233/IPOL_ATA(2021)652233_EN.pdf.
Frias-Martinez, V., Sloate, E., Manglunia, H., and Wu, J. (2021). Causal effect of low-income areas on shared dockless e-scooter use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103038.
Fukushige, T., Fitch, T. D., and Handy, S. (2021). Factors influencing dock-less E-bike-share mode substitution: Evidence from Sacramento, California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102990.
Fung, C. M., McArthur, D. P., and Hong, J. (2021). Examining the effects of a temporary subway closure on cycling in Glasgow using bike-sharing data. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.06.002.
Guo, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Understanding factors influencing shared e-scooter usage and its impact on auto mode substitution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102991.
Hosseinzadeh, Karimpour and Kluger (2021). Factors influencing shared micromobility services: An analysis of e-scooters and bikeshare. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103047.
Hu, J-W., and Creutzig, F. (2021). A systematic review on shared mobility in China. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1879974.
Latinopoulos, C., Patrier, A., and Sivakumar, A. (2021). Planning for e-scooter use in metropolitan cities: A case study for Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103037.
Lipovsky, C. (2021). Free-floating electric scooters: representation in French mainstream media. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1809752.
Maltese, I., Gatta, V., and Marcucci, E. (2021). Active Travel in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. An Italian overview. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100621.
Rejali, S., Aghabayk, K., Mohammadi, A., and Shiwakoti, N. (2021). Assessing a priori acceptance of shared dockless e-scooters in Iran. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103042.
Sadeghinasr, B. et al. (2021). Mining dockless bikeshare data for insights into cyclist behaviour and preferences: Evidence from the Boston region. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103044.
Tan, X., Zhu, X., Li, Q., Li, L., and Chen, J. (2021). Tidal phenomenon of the dockless bike-sharing system and its causes: the case of Beijing. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1871129.
Yang, Y., Jiang, L., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Tourists on shared bikes: Can bike-sharing boost attraction demand? Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104328.
Zhao, Y., and Ke, J. (2021). The impact of shared mobility services on housing values near subway stations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103097.

2020

Dill, J., and McNeil, N. (2020). Are Shared Vehicles Shared by All? A Review of Equity and Vehicle Sharing. Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220966732.
Hosseinzadeh, A., Algomaiah, M., Kluger, R., and Li, Z. (2020). E-scooters and Sustainability: Investigating the Relationship between the Density of E-Scooter Trips and Characteristics of Sustainable Urban Development. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624.
Lozzi, G., Rodrigues, M., Marcucci, E., Teoh, T., Gatta, V., and Pacelli, V. (2020). Research for TRAN Committee – COVID-19 and urban mobility: impacts and perspectives, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_IDA(2020)652213.

Urban & Shared Mobility

Urban & Shared Mobility

2023

2022

2021

2020

Annick Roetynck

Campaign success

Member profile