2023

• Couve, C., Lam, T., and Verlinghieri, E. (2023). Delivering Good Work: Labour, employment and wellbeing in London’s cargo bike sector. The University of Westminster. https://blog.westminster.ac.uk/ata/delivering-good-work-labour-employment-and-wellbeing-in-londons-cargo-bike-sector/.
• Dalla Chiara, G., Donnelly, G., Gunes, S., and Goodchild, A. (2023). How cargo cycle drivers use the urban transport infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.103562.
• Graeme Sherriff a, Luke Blazejewski a, Nick Davies (2023). ‘Why would you swap your nice warm van, where you can eat your butties and listen to the radio?’ Mainstreaming a niche of cycle logistics in the United Kingdom. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103062
• Faheem Ahmed Malik, Robert Egan, Conor Mark Dowling et al (2023). Factors influencing e-cargo bike mode choice for small businesses. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113253

2022

• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Carracedo, D., and Mostofi, H. (2022). Electric cargo bikes in urban areas: A new mobility option for private transportation. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100705.
• Cudok, A., Neugebauer, L ., and Vietor, T. (2022). Increasing Acceptance for Refurbished Products at the Example of E-Cargo Bikes. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.095.
• Gonzalez-Calderon, C.A., Posada-Henao, J.J., Granada-Muñoza, C.A., et al. (2022). Cargo bicycles as an alternative to make sustainable last-mile deliveries in Medellin, Colombia. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.04.006.
• Narayanan, S., and Antoniou, C. (2022). Electric cargo cycles – A comprehensive review. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.011.
• Narayanan, S., Gruber, J., Liedtke, G., and Antoniou, C. (2022). Purchase intention and actual purchase of cargo cycles: Influencing factors and policy insights. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.007.
• Schünemann, J., Finke, S., Severengiz, S., Schelte, N., and Gandhi, S. (2022). Life Cycle Assessment on Electric Cargo Bikes for the Use-Case of Urban Freight Transportation in Ghana. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.120.

2021

• Fontaine, P. (2021). The Vehicle Routing Problem with Load-Dependent Travel Times for Cargo Bicycles. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.09.009.
• Giordano, Matthews, Baptista & Fischbeck (2021). Impacts of topography and weather barriers on commercial cargo bicycle energy using urban delivery crowdsourced cycling data. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103326.
• Possible., ATA., and KR Foundation. (2021). The Promise of Low-Carbon Freight: Benefits of cargo bikes in London. https://smarttransportpub.blob.core.windows.net/web/1/root/the-promise-of-low-carbon-freight.pdf.
• Thomas, A. (2021). Electric bicycles and cargo bikes—Tools for parents to keep on biking in auto-centric communities? Findings from a US metropolitan area. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1914787.

Earlier

• Arnold, F., Cardenas, I., Sörensen, K., and Dewulf, W. (2018, revised). Simulation of B2C e-commerce distribution in Antwerp using cargo bikes and delivery points. European Transport Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0272-6.
• Assmann, T., and Behrendt, F. (2017). Determining optimal container heights for cargobike crossdocking schemes in urban areas. Conference: 10th International Doctoral Students Workshop on Logistics, At Magdeburg, Germany.
• Hofmann, W., Assmann, T., Neghabadi, P. D., Cung, V.D., and Tolujevs, J.  (2017). A Simulation Tool to Assess the Integration of Cargo Bikes into an Urban Distribution System. Conference: The 5th International Workshop on Simulation for Energy, Sustainable Development & Environment, At Barcelona, Spain. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01875988.
• Landesinstitut Für Arbeitsgestaltung. Good vibrations? Unterschätztes Risiko von Vibrationen bei Lastenpedelecs. Retrieved from https://www.lia.nrw.de/service/publikationen-downloads/LIA_fakten/index.html.
• Melo, S., and Baptista, P. (2017). Evaluating the impacts of using cargo cycles on urban logistics:integrating traffic, environmental and operational boundaries. European Transport Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0246-8.

2023

• Caspi, O (2023). Equity implications of electric bikesharing in Philadelphia. GeoJournal. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10708-022-10698-1
• Choi, S.E., Kim, J., and Seo, D. (2023). Travel patterns of free-floating e-bike-sharing users before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104065.
• Tatsuya Fukushige, Dillon T. Fitch, Susan Handy (2023). Estimating Vehicle-miles travelled reduced from Dock-less E-bike-share: Evidence from Sacramento, California. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103671
• Jenkins, M., O’Rourke, N., Lustosa, L. et al (2023). Self-selected pedal-assist E-bike use in older adults is moderate-vigorous intensity. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101647
• Liu, J., Chen, X. (2023). Analysis of college students’ phone call behaviour while riding e-bikes: An application of the extended theory of planned behaviour. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101635
• Liu, M., Zhang, K., Liang, Y., et al. (2023). Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of electric bicycles with different batteries in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135715.
• Minh Hieu Nguyen, Duy Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Lester W. Johnson (2023). Why do parents intend to permit their children to ride e-bikes? Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100586
• Sun, S., Wang, Z., Wang, W. (2023) Can free-floating electric bike sharing promote more sustainable urban mobility? Evidence from a life cycle environmental impact assessment. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137862
• Wang, H., Fen Su, F., and Schwebel, D.C. (2023). Mobile phone use while cycling among e-bikers in China: Reasoned or social reactive? Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.002.
• Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Hem B., and Yang, L. (2023). Mode substitution and carbon emission impacts of electric bike sharing systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104312.

2022

• Bourne, J.E., Kelly, P., and Mutrie, N. (2022). The rise of the electrically assisted bicycle and the individual, social and environmental impacts of use. Advances in Transport Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2022.04.003.
• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Chai, H., Zhang, Z., Xue, J., and Hu, H. (2022). A quantitative traffic performance comparison study of bicycles and E-bikes at the non-signalized intersections: Evidence from survey data. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106853.
• Haufe, S., Boeck, H., Hackl, S., et al (2022). Impact of electrically assisted bicycles on physical activity and traffic accident risk: a prospective observational study. BMJ Journals. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001275
• Huang, Y., Jiang, L., Chen, H., Dave, K., and Parry, T. (2022). Comparative life cycle assessment of electric bikes for commuting in the UK. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103213.
• Jenkins, M., Lustosa, L., Chia, V. et al. (2022). What do we know about pedal assist E-bikes? A scoping review to inform future directions. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.005.
• Kumar, R., Pachauri, R. K., Badoni, P., et al. (2022). Investigation on parallel hybrid electric bicycle along with issuer management system for mountainous region. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132430.
• Li, L., Liu, B., Zheng, W., Wu, X., Song, L., and Dong, W. (2022). Investigation and numerical reconstruction of a full-scale electric bicycle fire experiment in high-rise residential building. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102304.
• Mehra, A., Singh, R., Chauhan, A.S. et al. (2022). Design and analysis of an electric bike chassis. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.247.
• Morgan Hughey, S., Sella, J., Adams, J.D., et al. (2022). It’s electric! Measuring energy expenditure and perceptual differences between bicycles and electric-assist bicycles. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101523.
• Murugan, M. and Marisamynathan, S. (2022). Estimation of two-wheeler users’ mode shift behavior and policy analysis to encourage electric-bike adoption in India. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.06.006.
• Philips, I., Anable, J. and Chatterton, T. (2022). E-bikes and their capacity to reduce car CO2 emissions. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.11.019.
• Sahwal, C.P., Dinh, T.Q., and Sengupta, S. (2022). Controller development of thermal management system for electric bikes. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.135.
• Septiadi, W.N., Alim, M., and Adi, M.N.P. (2022). The application of battery thermal management system based on heat pipes and phase change materials in the electric bike. Journal of Energy Storage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106014.
• Shuai, C., Yang, F., Wang, W., Shan, J., Zheng, C., and Xin, O. (2022). Promoting Charging Safety of Electric Bicycles via Machine Learning. iScience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105786.
• Sweeney, S., Lhachemi, H., Mannion, A., Russo, G., and Shorten, R. (2022). Pitchfork-bifurcation-based competitive and collaborative control of an E-bike system. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110595.
• Xu, C., Wang, L., Easa, S.M., and Yang, Y. (2022). Analysis of students’ anger during riding electric bicycles on campus. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09561.
• Zhang, F., Ji, Y., Lv, H., et al. (2022). Self-reported anger among ordinary and delivery electric bike riders in China: A comparison based on the cycling anger scale. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.002.
• Zhou, X., Ji, Y., and Yuan, Y. et al. (2022). Spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of commuting by shared electric bike: A case study of Ningbo, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132337.
• Zhu, Z., and Lu, C. (2022). Life cycle assessment of shared electric bicycle on greenhouse gas emissions in China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160546

2021

• Alessio, H. M., Reiman, T., Kemper, B., Von Carlowitz, W., Bailer, A. J., and Timmerman, K. (2021). Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Simulated Commute on an E-Bike. Translational Journal of the ACSM. https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000155.
• Anderson, A., Adell, E., and Hiselius, L. W. (2021). What is the substitution effect of e-bikes? A randomised controlled trial. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102648.
• Deakin, N. L. (2021). Recognising the physical and social characteristics of urban cycling environments (PHD). Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/0b2cb8ed-3d15-4b65-9c1f-2bbd61ba8be1.
• Hallberg, M., Rasmussen, T. K., and Rich, J. (2021). Modelling the impact of cycle superhighways and electric bicycles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.015.
• Mitterwallner, V., Steinbauer, P. M., Besold, A., et al. (2021). Electrically assisted mountain biking: Riding faster, higher, farther in natural mountain systems. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100448.
• Rérat, P. (2021). The rise of the e-bike: Towards an extension of the practice of cycling? Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1897236.
• Stilo, L., Segura-Velandia, D., Lugo, H., Conway, P. P., and West, A. A. (2021). Electric bicycles, next generation low carbon transport systems: A survey. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100347.
• Thomas, A. (2021). Electric bicycles and cargo bikes—Tools for parents to keep on biking in auto-centric communities? Findings from a US metropolitan area. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1914787.
• Tscharaktschiew, S., & Müller, S. (2021). Ride to the hills, ride to your school: Physical effort and mode choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102983.

2020

• Bourne, J, E., Cooper, A, R., Kelly, P., Kinnear, F, J., England, C., Leary, S., and Page, A. (2020). The impact of e-cycling on travel behaviour: A scoping review. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100910.
• Fyhri, A., and Sundfør, H., B. (2020). Do people who buy e-bikes cycle more? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102422.
• Hasnine, S., Dianat, A., and Nurul Habib, K. (2020). Investigating the factors affecting the distance travel and health conditions of e-bike users in Toronto. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100265.
• Kazemzadeh, K., and Ronchi, E. (2020). From bike to electric bike level-of-service. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1900450.
• McQueen, M., MacArthur, J., and Cherry, C. (2020). The e-bike potential: estimating regional e-bike impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. Transport Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102482.

Earlier

• Astegiano, P., Tampere, C., Mayeres, I., and Himpe. (2017). Electric Cycling in Flanders: Empirical Research into the Functional Use of the e-Bike. KU Leuven. KU Leuven.
• Behrendt, F. (2015). Why cycling matters for electric mobility: towards diverse, active and sustainable e-mobilities. Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1335463.
• Berntsen, S., Malnes, L., Langaker, A., and Bere, E. (2017). Physical activity when riding an electric assisted bicycle. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0513-z.
• Fishman, E., & Cherry, C. (2015). E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907.
• Fyhri, A., Heinen, E., Fearnley, N., amd Sundfør, H.B. (2017). A push to cycling—exploring the e-bike’s role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1302526.
• Huertas-Leyva, P., Dozzal, M., and Baldanzini, N. (2019). E-bikers’ braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study. Traffic Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1643015.
• Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid (KiM). (2019). Gebruik van e-fiets en effecten op andere vervoerwijzen. https://www.kimnet.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2019/12/02/gebruik-van-e-fiets-en-effecten-op-andere-vervoerwijzen.
• Ling, Z., Cherry,. MacArthur, J. H., and Weinert, X. J. (2017). Differences of Cycling Experiences and Perceptions between E-Bike and Bicycle Users in the United States. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091662.
• Liu, Y., Ji, Y., Liu, Q., and He, M. (2017). Investigating electric bicycles as a travel mode choice for escorting children to school. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/2634-02.
• Salmerón-Manzano, E., and Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018). The Electric Bicycle: Worldwide Research Trends. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071894.
• Plazier, P. A., Weitkamp, G., and van den Berg, A. E. (2017). “Cycling was never so easy!” An analysis of e-bike commuters’ motives, travel behaviour and experiences using GPS-tracking and interviews. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.09.017.
• Plazier, P. A., Weitkamp, G., and van den Berg, A. E. (2017). The potential for e-biking among the younger population: A study of Dutch students. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.04.007.
• Plazier, P., van den Berg, A. E., and Weitkamp, G. (2016). Commuting by e-bike: a mixed methods approach. RGS-IBG Conference, London, United Kingdom.

2023

• Bach, X., Marquet, O., and Miralles-Guasch, C. (2023). Assessing social and spatial access equity in regulatory frameworks for moped-style scooter sharing services. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.002.
• Chien, Y-H., Hsieh, I-Y.L., and Chang, T-H. (2023). Beyond personal vehicles: How electrifying scooters will help achieve climate mitigation goals in Taiwan. Energy Strategy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101056.
• Hooper, J. M., Williams, D., Roberts-Bee, K., et al. (2023). Defining a vibration test profile for assessing the durability of electric motorcycle battery assemblies. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232541.
• Malikasab Bagawan, M. Vamsi Krishna, P. Rohit Kumar et al (2023) Design and analysis of electric motorcycle chassis frame. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.05.072    
• Uribe, A., Fernández-Montoya, M., Vargas, J., et al. (2023). Discrete event simulation for battery-swapping station sizing for hybrid and electric motorcycles. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136155.

2022

• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Carranza, G., Do Nascimiento, M., Fanals, J., Febrer, J., and Valderrama, C. (2022). Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of the electric motorcycle in the city of Barcelona and the impact on air pollution. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153419.

2020

• Eccarius, T. and Lu, C.C. (2020). Powered two-wheelers for sustainable mobility: A review of consumer adoption of electric motorcycles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1540735.

Earlier

• Koossalapeerom, T., Satiennam, T., Satiennam, Leelapatra, W., Seedam, A., and Rakpukdee, T. (2019). Comparative study of real-world driving cycles, energy consumption, and CO₂ emissions of electric and gasoline motorcycles driving in a congested urban corridor. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.031.
• Xuan, P. Y., Henz, M., & Weigl. (2013). Environmental impact of Converted Electrical Motorcycle. 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27) https://doi.org/10.1109/EVS.2013.6914813.

2023

• Jørgen Aarhaug a b, Nils Fearnley a, Espen Johnsson (2023). E-scooters and public transport – Complement or competition? Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101279
• Jørgen Aarhaug, Nils Fearnley, Knut Johannes Liland Hartveit et al (2023). Price and competition in emerging shared e-scooter markets. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101273
• Abouelela, M., Chaniotakis, E., and Antoniou, C. (2023). Understanding the landscape of shared-e-scooters in North America; Spatiotemporal analysis and policy insights. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103602.
• Ching-Fu Chen, Chia-Han Lee (2023). Investigating shared e-scooter users’ customer value co-creation behaviors and their antecedents: Perceived service quality and perceived value. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.015
• Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Pamucar, D., Chen, Y., and Coffman, D. (2023). Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based RAFSI model. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104426.
• Dominik Muehlbacher, Sebastian Will, Nora Merkel (2023) Compliance to eco-riding recommendations on an E-scooter: Effects on energy consumption and user acceptance. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100831
• Echeverría-Su, M., Huamanraime-Maquin, E., Cabrera, F.I., and Vázquez-Rowe, I. (2023). Transitioning to sustainable mobility in Lima, Peru. Are e-scooter sharing initiatives part of the problem or the solution?. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161130.
• Farzana Mehzabin Tuli, Arna Nishita Nithila, Suman Mitra (2023) Uncovering the spatio-temporal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shared e-scooter usage: A spatial panel model. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100843
• Rosa Félix, Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo, Filipe Moura (2023). Socio-economic assessment of shared e-scooters: do the benefits overcome the externalities? Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103714
• Abolfazl Karimpour a, Aryan Hosseinzadeh b, Robert Kluger (2023). A data-driven approach to estimating dockless electric scooter service areas. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103579
• Kazemzadeh, K., Haghani, M., and Sprei, F. (2023). Electric scooter safety: An integrative review of evidence from transport and medical research domains. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104313.
• Klein, N., Brown, A., and Thigpen, C. (2023). Clutter and Compliance: Scooter Parking Interventions and Perceptions. Active Travel Studies. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.1196.
• Kutela, B., and Mwekh’iga, R.J. (2023). A multi-criteria approach to prioritize electric-scooters ordinances. A case of Bloomington City, Indiana. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.100959.
• Mehdizadeh, M., Nordfjaern, T., and Klöckner, C.A. (2023). Drunk or Sober? Number of alcohol units perceived to be safe before riding e-scooter. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106930.
• Nicholas Klein, Anne Brown, Calvin Thigpen (2023) Clutter and Compliance: Scooter Parking Interventions and Perceptions. Active Travel Studies https://activetravelstudies.org/article/id/1196/
• Nitesh R. Shah, Jing Guo, Lee D. Han et al (2023) Why do people take e-scooter trips? Insights on temporal and spatial usage patterns of detailed trip data. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103705
• Nikiforiadis, A., Paschalidis, E., Stamatiadis, N., et al. (2023). E-scooters and other mode trip chaining: Preferences and attitudes of university students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103636.
• Oviedo, D., Moore, C., Trofimova, A. (2023). Toy or Tool: Expectations, Impacts, and Contradictions of E-Scooters from a Social-Exclusion Perspective. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4363779
• Reis, A.F., Baptista, P., and Moura, F (2023). How to promote the environmental sustainability of shared e-scooters: A life-cycle analysis based on a case study from Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100044.
• Mahdi Samadzad, Hossein Nosratzadeh, Hossein Karami et al (2023). What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user’s perspective? Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.006
• Sobrino, N., Gonzalez, J.N., Vassallo, J.M., and de los Angeles Baeza, M. (2023). Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.02.009.
• Matúš Šucha, Elisabeta Drimlová, Karel Rečka (2023) E-scooter riders and pedestrians: Attitudes and interactions in five countries. Heliyon Open Access. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15449
• Wei, W., Petit, Y., Arnoux, P-J., and Bailly, N. (2023). Head-ground impact conditions and helmet performance in E-scooter falls. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106935.
• White, E., Guo, F., Han, S., et al. (2023). What factors contribute to e-scooter crashes: A first look using a naturalistic riding approach. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.02.002.
• Yan, X., Zhao, X., Broaddus, A., et al. (2023). Evaluating shared e-scooters’ potential to enhance public transit and reduce driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103640.

2022

• Altintasi, O., and Yalcinkaya, S. (2022). Siting charging stations and identifying safe and convenient routes for environmentally sustainable e-scooter systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104020.
• Ayyildiz, E. (2022). A novel pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology for e-scooter charging station location-selection. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103459.
• Bascones, K., Maio Méndez, T.E., and Yañez Siller, F.A. (2022). E-scooter accidents: A new epidemic. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.02.001.
• Blazanin, G., Mondal, A., Asmussen, K.E., and Bhat, C.R. (2022). E-scooter sharing and bikesharing systems: An individual-level analysis of factors affecting first-use and use frequency. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103515.
• Brauner, T., Heumann, M., Kraschewski, T., et al. (2022). Web content mining analysis of e-scooter crash causes and implications in Germany. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106833.
• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Bodansky, D.M.S., Gach, M.W., Grant, M. et al. (2022). Legalisation of e-scooters in the UK: the injury rate and pattern is similar to those of bicycles in an inner city metropolitan area. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.016.
• Choi, S., Kwak, K., Yang, S., Lim, S., and Woo, JR. (2022). Effects of policy instruments on electric scooter adoption in Jakarta, Indonesia: A discrete choice experiment approach. Economic Analysis and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.015.
• Chu, J., Lin, H., Liao, H et al (2022). Dynamic repositioning problem of dockless electric scooter sharing systems. Taylor & Francis Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2129209
• Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., and Pamucar, D. et al. (2022). Safe E-scooter operation alternative prioritization using a q-rung orthopair Fuzzy Einstein based WASPAS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131239.
• Esztergár-Kiss, D., Tordai, D., and Lopez Lizarraga, J.C. (2022). Assessment of travel behavior related to e-scooters using a stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.010.
• Eyers V, Parry I and Zaid M (2022) In-Depth Investigation of E-Scooter Performance TRL Ltd https://mcusercontent.com/e31ae4ccb161b26b48f29468d/files/69a11740-598b-13f2-d014-50d19ddbec71/ACA104_In_Depth_Investigation_of_E_Scooter_Performance.pdf
• Foissaud, N., Gioldasis, C., Tamura, S., Christoforou, Z., and Farhi, N. (2022). Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas: A spatiotemporal analysis. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103335.
• Gebhardt, L., Ehrenberger, S., Wolf, C., and Cyganski, R. (2022). Can shared E-scooters reduce CO2 emissions by substituting car trips in Germany? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103328.
• Heydari, S., Forrest, M., Preston, J. (2022). Investigating the association between neighbourhood characteristics and e-scooter safety. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103982.
• Javadinasr, M., Asgharpour, S., Rahimi, E., et al. (2022). Eliciting attitudinal factors affecting the continuance use of E-scooters: An empirical study in Chicago. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.019.
• Karpinski, E., Bayles, E., Daigle, L., and Mantine, D. (2022). Comparison of motor-vehicle involved e-scooter fatalities with other traffic fatalities. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.008.
• Kazemzadeh, K., and Sprei, F. (2022). Towards an electric scooter level of service: A review and framework. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.06.005.
• Kimpton, A., Loginova, J., Pojani, D., et al. (2022). Weather to scoot? How weather shapes shared e-scooter ridership patterns. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103439.
• Leoni, J., Tanelli, M., Strada, S.C., and Savaresi, S.M. (2022). Assessing e-scooters safety and drivability: a quantitative analysis. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.294.
• Leurent, F. (2022). What is the value of swappable batteries for a shared e-scooter service? Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100843.
• Li, H., Yuan, Z., Novack, T., Huang, W., and Zipf, A. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
• Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
• Li, H., Yuan, Z., and Novack, T., et al. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
• Liazos, A., Iliopoulou, C., Kepaptsoglou, K., and Bakogiannis, E. (2022). Geofence planning for electric scooters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103149.
• Ma, Q., Xin, Y., Yang, H., and Xie, K. (2022). Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103376.
• Maher, F., Dháibhéid, C.M., Bowe, C., and Kearns, G. (2022). Maxillofacial injuries and electric scooter use in Ireland. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.174.
• McQueen, M., and Clifton, k.j. (2022). Assessing the perception of E-scooters as a practical and equitable first-mile/last-mile solution. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.021.
• Mouratidis, K. (2022). Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104161.
• Öztaş Karlı, R.G., Karlı, H., and Çelikyay, H.S. (2022). Investigating the acceptance of shared e-scooters: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.03.018.
• Shichman, I., Shaked, O., Factor, S., et al. (2022). The association between electric scooter riding position and injury characteristics. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.11.009.
• Suominen, E., Sajanti, A., Silver, E. et al. (2022). Alcohol intoxication and lack of helmet use are common in Electric Scooter related Traumatic Brain Injuries: a consecutive patient series from a tertiary university hospital. Brain and Spine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.101553.
• Tokey, A.I., Shioma, S.A., and Jamal, S. (2022). Analysis of spatiotemporal dynamics of e-scooter usage in Minneapolis: Effects of the built and social environment. Multimodal Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2022.100037.
• Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
• Useche, S.A., O’Hern, S., Gonzalez-Marin, A., et al. (2022). Unsafety on two wheels, or social prejudice? Proxying behavioral reports on bicycle and e-scooter riding safety – A mixed-methods study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.015.
• Vallamsundar, S., Jaikumar, R., Venugopal, M. (2022). Exploring the Spatial-temporal dynamics of travel patterns and air pollution exposure of E-scooters. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103477.
• Walton, T., Torija, A.J., and Elliott, A.S. (2022). Development of electric scooter alerting sounds using psychoacoustical metrics. Applied Acoustics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109136.
• Wang, K., Qian, X., Fitch, D.T. et al. (2022). What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639.
• Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., and Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468.
• Yang, H., Bao, Y., Huo, J., et al. (2022). Impact of road features on shared e-scooter trip volume: A study based on multiple membership multilevel model. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.005.
• Yang, H., Zheng, R., Li, X., et al. (2022). Nonlinear and threshold effects of the built environment on e-scooter sharing ridership. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103453.
• Yun, H., Kim, E., Ham, S. et al (2022). Price incentive strategy for the E-scooter sharing service using deep reinforcement service. Taylor & Francis Online. Price incentive strategy for the E-scooter sharing service using deep reinforcement learning: Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Vol 0, No 0 (tandfonline.com)
• Zhu, R., Kondor, D., and Cheng, C. et al. (2022). Solar photovoltaic generation for charging shared electric scooters. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118728.
• Zuniga-Garcia, N., Tec, M., Scott, J.G., and Machemehl, R.B. (2022). Evaluation of e-scooters as transit last-mile solution. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103660.

2021

• Abouelela, M., Haddad, C. A., and Antoniu, C. (2021). Are young users willing to shift from carsharing to scooter–sharing? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102821.
• Brown, A. (2021). Micromobility, Macro Goals: Aligning scooter parking policy with broader city objectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100508.
• Che, M., Lum, K.M., and Wong, Y.D. (2021). Users’ attitudes on electric scooter riding speed on shared footpath: A virtual reality study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1718252.
• Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena). (2021). E-Scooter-Sharing – eine ganzheitliche Bilanz: Potenziale von E-Scootern für eine nachhaltigere, urbane Mobilität. https://www.dena.de/newsroom/meldungen/studie-e-scooter-sharing/.
• Haworth, Schramm and Twisk (2021). Changes in shared and private e-scooter use in Brisbane, Australia and their safety implications. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106451.
• Jiao, J. (2021). Shared micro-mobility: The rise of and the future of E-scooters. Shared Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822900-2.00008-1.
• Karlsen, K., and Fyhri, A. (2021). The joy and trouble with e-scooters. Institute of Transport Economics Norwegian Centre for Transport Research. https://www.toi.no/publications/the-joy-and-trouble-with-e-scooters-article36886-29.html.
• Karlsen, K., Johnsson, E., Fyhri, A., and Pokorny, P. (2021). Parking solutions for shared e-scooters. Institute of Transport Economics Norwegian Centre for Transport Research. https://www.toi.no/publications/parking-solutions-for-shared-e-scooters-article36746-29.html.
• Kopplin, S, C., Brand, M, B., and Reichenberger, Y. (2021). Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680.
• Latinopoulos, C., Patrier, A. and Sivakumar, A. (2021). Planning for e-scooter use in metropolitan cities: A case study for Paris. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103037.
• Lipovsky, C. (2021). Free-floating electric scooters: representation in French mainstream media. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1809752.
• Lee, H., Baek, K., Chung, J. H., and Kim, J. (2021). Factors affecting heterogeneity in willingness to use e-scooter sharing services. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102751.
• Lee, J. K., Yun, C. H., and Yun, M. H. (2021). Contextual risk factors in the use of electric kick scooters: An episode sampling inquiry. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105233.
• Leung, A. Burke, M., Kaufman, B., Zu., and Yang, E. (2021). Micromobility and toursit dispersal in Townsville: Do e-scooters help tourists spread out, visit more sites and spend more? Griffith University. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qML5MzWaGrqbHz5QMgg1aElBuktqB9jV/view.
• Ma, Q., Yang, H., Ma, Y., Yang, D., Hu, X., and Xie, K. (2021). Examining municipal guidelines for users of shared E-Scooters in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102710.
• Merlin, L, A., Yan, X., Xu, Y., and Zhao, X. (2021). A segment-level model of shared, electric scooter origins and destinations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102709.
• Mitra, R., and Hess, P. M. (2021). Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004.
• Ratan, R., Earle, K., Roesenthal, S., et al. (2021). The (digital) medium of mobility is the message: Examining the influence of e-scooter mobile app perceptions on e-scooter use intent. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100076.
• Siebert, F. W., Ringhand, M., Englert, F., et al. (2021). Braking bad – Ergonomic design and implications for the safe use of shared E-scooters. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105294.
• Wang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, K., and Liu, P. (2021). Are shared electric scooters energy efficient? Communications in Transportation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2021.100022.
• Yang, H., Huo, J., Bao, Y., Li, X., Yang, L., and Cherry, C.R. (2021). Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.09.012.
• Yang, X., Yang, W., Zhang, X. et al. (2021). A spatiotemporal analysis of e-scooters’ relationships with transit and station-based bikeshare. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103088.
• Zhang, W., Buehler, R., Broaddus, A., and Sweeney, T. (2021). What type of infrastructures do e-scooter riders prefer? A route choice model. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102761.
• Zuniga-Garcia, N., Ruiz Juri, N., Perrine, A. K., & Machemehl, B. R. (2021). E-scooters in urban infrastructure: understanding sidewalk, bike lane, and roadway usage from trajectory data. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.004.

2020

• Sanders, R. L., Branion-Calles, M., and Nelson, T. A. (2020). To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A: policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009.
• Severengiz, S., Finke, S., Schelte, N., and Wendt, N. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment on the Mobility Service E-Scooter Sharing. 2020 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit. 10.1109/E-TEMS46250.2020.9111817.

2023

• Bretones, A., and Marquet, O. (2023). Riding to health: Investigating the relationship between micromobility use and objective physical activity in Barcelona adults. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101588.
• Wei, W., Petit, Y., Arnoux, P-J., and Bailly, N. (2023). Head-ground impact conditions and helmet performance in E-scooter falls. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106935.
• White, E., Guo, F., Han, S., et al. (2023). What factors contribute to e-scooter crashes: A first look using a naturalistic riding approach. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.02.002.

2022

• Aurora, F., Cove, G., Sandhu, P., Gormley, M., and Thomas, S. (2022). Oral and maxillofacial injuries from electric scooters in Bristol; a retrospective observational study. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.031.
• Bascones, K., Maio Méndez, T.E., and Yañez Siller, F.A. (2022). E-scooter accidents: A new epidemic. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.02.001.
• Bodansky, D.M.S., Gach, M.W., Grant, M. et al. (2022). Legalisation of e-scooters in the UK: the injury rate and pattern is similar to those of bicycles in an inner city metropolitan area. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.016.
• Chang, F. et al. (2022). Crash injury severity of E-Bike Riders: A random parameters generalized ordered probit model with heterogeneity in means. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105545.
• Ferreira, S., Amorim, M., Lobo, A., Kern, M., Fanderl, N., and Couto, A. (2022). Travel mode preferences among German commuters over the course of COVID-19 pandemic. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.011.
• Liu, Y., Wan, X., et al. (2022). A novel approach to investigate effects of front-end structures on injury response of e-bike riders: Combining Monte Carlo sampling, automatic operation, and data mining. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106599.
• Maher, F., Dháibhéid, C.M., Bowe, C., and Kearns, G. (2022). Maxillofacial injuries and electric scooter use in Ireland. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.11.174.
• Morgan, C., Morgan, R., Dela Cruz, V.N.J.M., Ng Man Sun, S., and Sarraf, K.M. (2022). Pediatric electric scooter injuries in the UK: Case series and review of literature. Traffic Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2022.2084540.
• Schneider, R., Masselot, P., Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M., Sera, F., Blangiardo, M. et al. (2022). Differential impact of government lockdown policies on reducing air pollution levels and related mortality in Europe. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04277-6.
• Shichman, I., Shaked, O., Factor, S., et al. (2022). The association between electric scooter riding position and injury characteristics. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.11.009.
• Suominen, E., Sajanti, A., Silver, E. et al. (2022). Alcohol intoxication and lack of helmet use are common in Electric Scooter related Traumatic Brain Injuries: a consecutive patient series from a tertiary university hospital. Brain and Spine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.101553.
• Van Cauwenberg, J., Schepers, P., Deforche, B., and de Geus, B. (2022). Effects of e-biking on older adults’ biking and walking frequencies, health, functionality and life space area: A prospective observational study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.12.006.
• van der Zaag, P.D., Rozema, R., Poos, P.A.M.H., van Minnen, B., Reininga, I.H.F. (2022). Maxillofacial Fractures in Electric and Conventional Bicycle-Related Accidents. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.03.020.

2021

• Aldred, R., Woodcock, J., and Goodman, A. (2021). Major investment in active travel in Outer London: Impacts on travel behaviour, physical activity, and health. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100958.
• Alessio, H., Reiman, T., Kemper, B., Von Carlowitz, W., Bailer, A. J., and Timmerman, K. L. (2021). Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Simulated Commute on an E-Bike. Translational Journal of the ACSM. https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000155.
• Kazemzadeh, K., and Koglin, T. (2021). Electric bike (non)users’ health and comfort concerns pre and peri a world pandemic (COVID-19): A qualitative study. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101014.
• Macharis, C., Tori, S., de Séjournet, A., Keseru, I., and Vanhaverbeke, L. (2021). Can the COVID-19 Crisis be a Catalyst for Transition to Sustainable Urban Mobility? Assessment of the Medium- and Longer-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Mobility in Brussels. Frontiers in Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.725689.
• Wild, K., Woodward, A., and Shaw, C. (2021). Gender and the E-bike: Exploring the Role of Electric Bikes in Increasing Women’s Access to Cycling and Physical Activity, Active Travel Studies. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.991.

Earlier

• Berntsen, S., Malnes, L., Langåker, A., and Bere, E. (2017). Physical activity when riding an electric assisted bicycle. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0513-z.
• Boele-Vos, M. J., Commandeur, J. J. F., and Twisk, D. A. M. (2017). Effect of physical effort on mental workload of cyclists in real traffic in relation to age and use of pedelecs. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.025.
• Bourne, J. E., Sauchelli, S., Perry, R., Page, A., Leary, S., England, C., and Cooper, R. A. (2018). Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8.
• Castro, A., Gaupp-Berghausen, M., Dons, E., Standaert, A., et al. (2019). Physical activity of electric bicycle users compared to conventional bicycle users and non-cyclists: Insights based on health and transport data from an online survey in seven European cities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100017.
• Hall, C., Hoj, T. H., Clark, J., Geoff, W., Chaney, R. A., Crookston, B., and West, J. (2019). Pedal-Assist Mountain Bikes: A Pilot Study Comparison of the Exercise Response, Perceptions, and Beliefs of Experienced Mountain Bikers. JMIR Formative Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/13643.
• Höchsmann, C., Meister, S., Gehrig, D., et al. (2018). Effect of E-Bike Versus Bike Commuting on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Adults: A 4-Week Randomized Pilot Study. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000438.
• Langford, B.C., Cherry, C., Bassett Jr, D., Fitzhugh, E., and Dhaka, N. (2017). Comparing physical activity of pedal-assist electric bikes with walking and conventional bicycles.  Journal of Transport. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.002.
• Stokols, D., Novaco, R. W., Stokols, J., and Campbell, J. (1978). Traffic congestion, Type A behavior, and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.467.
• Peterman, J.E., Morris, K.L., Kram, R., and Byrnes, C. W. (2016). Pedelecs as a physically active transportation mode. European Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3408-9.
• Sundfør, H. B., and Fyhri, A. (2017). A push for public health: the effect of e-bikes on physical activity levels. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4817-3.
• Twisk, D. A. M., Platteel, S., and Lovegrove, G. R. (2017). An experiment on rider stability while mounting: Comparing middle-aged and elderly cyclists on pedelecs and conventional bicycles.  Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.004.
• Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Yang, J. et al. (2018). Road traffic injuries among riders of electric bike/electric moped in southern China. Traffic Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1423681.

2023

• Aitor Ballano, Anas Al-Rahamneh, Adrian Serrano-Hernandez et al (2023) Agent-based modelling and simulation for hub and electric last mile distribution in Vienna. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.03.094
• Jenny Díaz-Ramírez, Sebastián Zazueta-Nassif, Roberto Galarza-Tamez et al (2023) Characterization of urban distribution networks with light electric freight vehicles. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103719
• Schomakers, E-M., Lotz, V., Glawe, F., and Ziefle, M. (2023). The effect of design and behaviour of automated micro-vehicles for urban delivery on other road users’ perceptions. Multimodal Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2023.100079.
• Azad, M., Rose, W.J., MacArthur, J.H., and Cherry, C.R. (2023). E-trikes for urban delivery: An empirical mixed-fleet simulation approach to assess city logistics sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104641.

2021

• agiplan GmbH (2021). Micro Depots in the intermunicipal network using the example of the municipalities of Krefeld, Mönchengladbach. Industrie und Handelskammer Mittlerer Niederrhein. Handbook PDF document download. Part 2 Concept to Implementation PDF download.
• Caggiani, L., Colovic, A., Prencipe, L, P., and Ottomanelli, M. (2021). A green logistics solution for last-mile deliveries considering e-vans and e-cargo bikes. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.010.
• Slob, A.W. (2021). Light electric vehicles in the Dutch mobility sector from an institutional logis perspective. Faculty of geosciences, Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/403181.

2020

• Tsakalidis, A., Krause, J., Julea, A., Peduzzi, E., Pisoni, E., and Thiel, C. (2020). Electric light commercial vehicles: Are they the sleeping giant of electromobility? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102421.

Earlier

• Huang, F.H. (2019). Understanding user acceptance of battery swapping service of sustainable transport: An empirical study of a battery swap station for electric scooters, Taiwan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1547464.
• Oliveira, C. M., Bandeira, R. A., Goes, G. V., Goncalves, D. N. S., and D’Agosto, M. (2017). Sustainable Vehicles-Based Alternatives in Last Mile Distribution of Urban Freight Transport: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081324.
• Ploos van Amstel, W., Balm, S., Warmerdam, J., Boerema, M., et al. (2018). City logistics: Light and electric: LEFV-logic: research on light electric freight vehicles. Faculty of Technology: Vol. 13. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. https://www.dropbox.com/s/jtynb22ir25ygj9/lefv-logic.english.pdf?dl=0 .

2022

• Murugan, M. and Marisamynathan, S. (2022). Mode shift behaviour and user willingness to adopt the electric two-wheeler: A study based on Indian road user preferences. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.03.008.

2021

• Tunçel, N. (2021). Intention to purchase electric vehicles: Evidence from an emerging market. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100764.

Earlier

• Arsenio, E., Dias, J. V., Lopes, S. A., and Pereira, H. I. (2018). Assessing the market potential of electric bicycles and ICT for low carbon school travel: a case study in the Smart City of ÁGUEDA. European Transport Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0279-z.

2023

• Bretones, A., and Marquet, O. (2023). Riding to health: Investigating the relationship between micromobility use and objective physical activity in Barcelona adults. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101588.
• Cubells, J., Miralles-Guasch, C., and Marquet, O. (2023). Gendered travel behaviour in micromobility? Travel speed and route choice through the lens of intersecting identities. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103502.
• Azise Oumar Diallo, Thibault Gloriot, Ouassim Manout (2023) Agent-based simulation of shared bikes and e-scooters: the case of Lyon. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.03.047
• Fatih Ecer, Hande Küçükönder, Sema Kayapınar Kaya et al (2023) Sustainability performance analysis of micro-mobility solutions in urban transportation with a novel IVFNN-Delphi-LOPCOW-CoCoSo framework. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103667
• Fan Zhang, Huitao Lyu, Yanjie Ji et al (2023) Battery swapping demand simulation for electric micromobility vehicles considering multi-source information interaction and behaviour decision Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137525
• Hong, D., Jang, S., and Lee, C. (2023). Investigation of shared micromobility preference for last-mile travel on shared parking lots in city center. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.09.002.
• Olabi, A.G., Wilberforce, T., Obaideen, K., et al. (2023). Micromobility: progress, benefits, challenges, policy and regulations, energy sources and storage, and its role in achieving sustainable development goals. International Journal of Thermofluids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100292.
• Schumann, H., Haitao, H., Quddus, M (2023). Passively generated big data for micro-mobility: State-of-the-art and future research directions. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103795
• Yuqian Zhang, Fan Zhang, Yanjie Ji et al (2023) Understanding the illegal charging intention of electric micro-mobility vehicle users by extending the theory of planned behavior. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137491    
• Zhang, C., Du,B., Zheng, Z., and Shen, J. (2023). Space sharing between pedestrians and micro-mobility vehicles: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103629.
• Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., Ji, Y., Liu, Y. (2023). Understanding the illegal charging intention of electric micro-mobility vehicle users by extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137491.

2022

• Adjei, F., Cimador, T., Severengiz, S. (2022). Electrically powered micro mobility vehicles in Ghana: transition process with a focus on social acceptance. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.127.
• Altintasi, O., and Yalcinkaya, S. (2022). Siting charging stations and identifying safe and convenient routes for environmentally sustainable e-scooter systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104020.
• Asensio, O.I., Apablaza, C.Z., Cade Lawson, M., Chen, E.W., and Horner, S.J. (2022). Impacts of micromobility on car displacement with evidence from a natural experiment and geofencing policy. Nature Energy. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01135-1.
• Bretones, A., and Marquet, O. (2022). Sociopsychological factors associated with the adoption and usage of electric micromobility. A literature review. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.008.
• Chicco, A. and Diana, M. (2022). Understanding micro-mobility usage patterns: a preliminary comparison between dockless bike sharing and e-scooters in the city of Turin (Italy). Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
• Dozza, M., Li, T., Billstein, L., Svernlöv, C., and Rasch, A. (2022). How do different micro-mobility vehicles affect longitudinal control? Results from a field experiment. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.005.
• Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Cocuzza, E. et al. (2022). Developing micromobility in urban areas: network planning criteria for e-scooters and electric micromobility devices. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.058.
• Jiao, J., Lee, H.K., and Choi, S.J. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849.
• Li, H., Yuan, Z., Novack, T., Huang, W., and Zipf, A. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
• Liu, H-C., Lin, J-J. (2022). Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.012.
• Liu, L., and Miller, H.J. (2022). Measuring the impacts of dockless micro-mobility services on public transit accessibility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101885.
• Lu, F., Yan, L., and Huang, B. (2022). Site selection for shared charging and swapping stations using the SECA and TRUST methods. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.378.
• Medina-Molina, C., Pérez-Macías, N., and Gismera-Tierno, L. (2022). The multi-level perspective and micromobility services. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100183.
• Reck, J. D., Martin, H., and Axhausen, K. W. (2022). Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103134.
• Sun, S. and Ertz, M. (2022). Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from urban transportation big data. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104045.
• Tier (2022). Segregated infrastructure: the key to micro-mobility safety and adoption. Tier. Segregated infrastructure: the key to micro-mobility safety and adoption | TIER Blog
• Torabi, K., Araghi, Y., van Oort, N., and Hoogendoorn, S. (2022). Passengers preferences for using emerging modes as first/last mile transport to and from a multimodal hub case study Delft Campus railway station. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.011.
• van Kuijk, R.J., Almeida Correia, G.H., van Oort, N., and van Arem, B. (2022). Preferences for first and last mile shared mobility between stops and activity locations: A case study of local public transport users in Utrecht, the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.008.

2021

• Buehler, R., Broaddus, A., Sweeney, T., Zhang, W., and White, E. (2021). Changes in Travel Behavior, Attitudes, and Preferences among E-Scooter Riders and Non-Riders: A First Look at Results from Pre and Post E-Scooter System Launch Surveys at Virginia Tech. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211002213.
• European Platform of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. (2021). Safe use of Micromobility Devices in Urban Areas. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/sump_topic_guide_micromobility_devices.pdf.
• Hosseinzadeh, A., Karimpour, A. and Kluger, R. (2021). Factors influencing shared micromobility services: An analysis of e-scooters and bikeshare. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103047.
• Ququ, S., Giorbano, P.F., and Limongelli, M.P. (2021). Shared micromobility-driven modal identification of urban bridges. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104048.
• Reck, D. J., Haitao, H., Guidon, S., and Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Explaining shared micromobility usage, competition and mode choice by modelling empirical data from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102947.
• Meng, S., & Brown, A. (2021). Docked vs. dockless equity: Comparing three micromobility service geographies. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103185.
• Samsonova, T (2021). Micromobility, Equity and Sustainability Summary and Conclusions. International Transport Forum. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/micromobility-equity-sustainability.pdf.
• Sun, B., Garikapati, V., Wilson, A. and Duvall, A. (2021). Estimating energy bounds for adoption of shared micromobility. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103012.

2020

• Behrami, F., and Rigal, A. (2020). Planning for plurality of streets: a spheric approach to micromobilities. Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1984850.
• EIT reports on e-micromobility. (2020).
  • Overview of e-micromobility related conditions and constraints
  • Living lab e-micromobility – MOBY Guideline of best practices, and results of e-micromobile integration potentials
  • E-Micromobility Safety Assessment
  • Examining the impact of a sustainable electric micromobility approach in Europe
• Laa, B., & Leth, U. (2020). Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874.
• McQueen, M., Abou-Zeid, G. MacArthur, J., and Clifton, K. (2020). Transportation Transformation: Is Micromobility Making a Macro Impact on Sustainability? Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220972696.
• Moreau, H.,  de Jamblinne de Meux, L., Zeller, V., D’Ans, P., Ruwet, R.,  Achten, W.M.J. (2020). Dockless E-Scooter: A Green Solution for Mobility? Comparative Case Study between Dockless E-Scooters, Displaced Transport, and Personal E-Scooters. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051803.
• Oeschger, G., Caroll, P., and Caulfield, B. (2020). Micromobility and public transport integration: The current state of knowledge. Transportation Research part D: transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102628.

2023

• Hasselwander, M., Nieland, S., Dematera-Contreras, K. et al (2023) MaaS for the masses: Potential transit accessibility gains and required policies under Mobility-as-a-Service. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2023.100086
• Krauss, K., Reck, D.J., and Axhausen, K.W. (2023). How does transport supply and mobility behaviour impact preferences for MaaS bundles? A multi-city approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2023.104013.
• McIlroy, R.C (2023) Mobility as a service and gender: A review with a view. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100596

2022

• Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., and Njoya, E.T. (2022). Mobility as a service (MaaS): A thematic map of challenges and opportunities. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100783.
• Labee, P., Rasouli, S., and Liao, F. (2022). The implications of Mobility as a Service for urban emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103128.
• Lindkvist, H., and Melander, L. (2022). How sustainable are urban transport services? A comparison of MaaS and UCC. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100829.
• Liu, L., and Miller, H.J. (2022). Measuring the impacts of dockless micro-mobility services on public transit accessibility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101885.
• Smith, G., Sochor, J., and Karlsson, I.C.M. (2022). Adopting Mobility-as-a-Service: An empirical analysis of end-users’ experiences. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.001.

2021

• Arias-Molinares, D., Julio, R., García-Palomares, J.C., and Gutiérrez, J. (2021). Exploring micromobility services: Characteristics of station-based bike-sharing users and their relationship with dockless services. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100010.
• Hensher, D. A., Mulley, C., and Nelson, J. D. (2021). Mobility as a service (MaaS) – Going somewhere or nowhere? Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.021.

2020

• Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid. (2020). Kansrijke verplaatsingen met Mobility-as-a-Service. ISBN/EAN: 978-90-8902-240-0.
• Zhao, X., Vaddadi, B., Sjöman, M., Hesselgren, M., & Pernestal, A. (2020). Key barriers in MaaS development and implementation: Lessons learned from testing Corporate MaaS (CMaaS). Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100227.
• Zijlstra, T., Durand, A., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., & Harms, L. (2020). Early adopters of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Netherlands. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.07.019.

• Active Travel Academy: brings together a broad spectrum of expertise to lead research with a focus on walking and cycling, use of other ‘micromobilities’ from e-scooters to electric hand cycles; and reduction in car use
• FERSI: The Forum of European Road Safety Research Institutes
• HVA: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences Faculty of Technology
• KU Leuven: ELECTA, this research division covers the broad spectrum of electrical energy systems and robust control of industrial systems
• LEVER: The Light Electric Vehicle Education and Research (LEVER) Initiative
• VUB Brussels: MOBI, the mobility, logistics and automotive technology research centre 

2023

• Mehdizadeh, M., Nordfjaern, T., and Klöckner, C.A. (2023). Drunk or Sober? Number of alcohol units perceived to be safe before riding e-scooter. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106930.
• Olsson, S.R., and Elldér, E. (2023). Are bicycle streets cyclist-friendly? Micro-environmental factors for improving perceived safety when cycling in mixed traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107007.
• Siebke, C., Bäumler, M., Blenz, K., et al. (2023). Predicting the impact on road safety of an intersection AEB at urban intersections. Using a novel virtual test field for the assessment of conflict prevention between cyclists/pedelecs and cars. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100728.
• Wang, H., Fen Su, F., and Schwebel, D.C. (2023). Mobile phone use while cycling among e-bikers in China: Reasoned or social reactive? Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.002.
• Yubing Zheng a, Yang Ma a, Said M. Easa et al (2023). Nomophobia, attitude and mobile phone use while riding an E-bike: Testing a dual-process model of self-control. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107032

2022

• Brauner, T., Heumann, M., Kraschewski, T., et al. (2022). Web content mining analysis of e-scooter crash causes and implications in Germany. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106833.
• Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., and Pamucar, D. et al. (2022). Safe E-scooter operation alternative prioritization using a q-rung orthopair Fuzzy Einstein based WASPAS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131239.
• Gitelman, v., Korchatov, A., and Carmel, R. (2022). Safety-related behaviours of e-cyclists on urban streets: an observational study in Israel. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.079.
• Heydari, S., Forrest, M., Preston, J. (2022). Investigating the association between neighbourhood characteristics and e-scooter safety. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103982.
• Huang, F.H. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing e-bike road safety: A survey study based on the experiences of Taiwanese cyclists. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103292.
• International Transport Forum. (2022). Streets that fit: Re-allocating space for better cities. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/streets-fit-allocating-space-better-cities.pdf.
• Karpinski, E., Bayles, E., Daigle, L., and Mantine, D. (2022). Comparison of motor-vehicle involved e-scooter fatalities with other traffic fatalities. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.008.
• Liazos, A. et al. (2022). Geofence planning for electric scooters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103149.
• Liu, Y., Wan, X., Xu, W., et al. (2022). An intelligent method for accident reconstruction involving car and e-bike coupling automatic simulation and multi-objective optimizations. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106476.
• Liu, Y., Wan, X., et al. (2022). A novel approach to investigate effects of front-end structures on injury response of e-bike riders: Combining Monte Carlo sampling, automatic operation, and data mining. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106599.
• Leoni, J., Tanelli, M., Strada, S.C., and Savaresi, S.M. (2022). Assessing e-scooters safety and drivability: a quantitative analysis. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.294.
• Safer City Streets. (2022). Monitoring Progress in Urban Road Safety. International Transport Forum. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/monitoring-progress-urban-road-safety-2022.pdf.
• Sun, S. and Xia, Y. (2022). The need for wider non-motor lanes: A study on the bicycle electrification process in China. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101374.
• Useche, S.A., O’Hern, S., Gonzalez-Marin, A., et al. (2022). Unsafety on two wheels, or social prejudice? Proxying behavioral reports on bicycle and e-scooter riding safety – A mixed-methods study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.015.
• Zhang, F., Ji, Y., Lv, H., et al. (2022). Self-reported anger among ordinary and delivery electric bike riders in China: A comparison based on the cycling anger scale. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.002.

2021

• European Platform of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. (2021). Safe use of Micromobility Devices in Urban Areas. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/sump_topic_guide_micromobility_devices.pdf.
• Kommers, A., and Brommelstroet, M. (2021). Divide or conquer: Problems and solutions for conflict definitions between different users of the cycle path. Contribution to the Colloquium Transport Planological Investigation. https://www.cvs-congres.nl/e2/site/cvs/custom/site/upload/file/cvs_2021/sessie_d/d6/cvs_79_verdeel_of_heers_problemen_en_oplossingsrichtingen_voor_conflictdefinities_tussen_verschillende_gebruikers_van_het_fietspad_1_2021.pdf .
• Serra, G.F., Fernandes, F.A.O., Noronha, E., and Alves de Sousa, R.J. (2021). Head protection in electric micromobility: A critical review, recommendations, and future trends. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106430.
• Zakhem, M. and Smith-Colin, J. (2021). Micromobility implementation challenges and opportunities: Analysis of e-scooter parking and high-use corridors. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103082.

Earlier

• Hertach, P., Uhr, A., Niemann, S., and Cavegn, M. (2018). Characteristics of single-vehicle crashes with e-bikes in Switzerland. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.021.

2022

• Herteleer, B., Van den Steen, N., Vanhaverbeke, L., and Cappelle, J. (2022). Analysis of initial speed pedelec usage for commuting purposes in Flanders. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100589.
• van der Salm, M., Chen, Z., and van Lierop, D. (2022). Who are those fast cyclists? An analysis of speed pedelec users in the Netherlands. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2152402.

2021

• Stelling, A., Vlakveld, W., and Twisk, D. (2021). Influencing factors of observed speed and rule compliance of speed-pedelec riders in high volume cycling areas: Implications for safety and legislation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106239.
• Twisk, D., Stelling, A., Van Gent, P., De Groot, J., and Vlakveld, W. (2021). Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940.
• Vlakveld, W., Mons, C., Kamphuis, K., Stelling, A., and Twisk, D. (2021). Traffic conflicts involving speed-pedelecs (fast electric bicycles): A naturalistic riding study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106201.

Earlier

• 6t-bureau de recherche, (2019), Marché et usages des speedelecs, Rapport final, 148 p. https://www.ademe.fr/sites/default/files/assets/documents/rapport-marche-usages-speedelec-charte-ademe-2020.pdf.
• Rotthier, B., Stevens G., Huyck B., Motoasca E., and Cappelle J. (2017). The rise of the speed pedelec, restrained by legislation? EVS30-9860742. Presented at the EVS, Stuttgart, 09-11 Oct 2017
• Van den Steen, N., Herteleer, B., Cappelle, J., and Vanhaverbeke, L. (2019). Motivations and barriers for using speed pedelecs for daily commuting. World Electr. Veh. J. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10040087.
• Van der Salm, M. L. M. (2020). De speed pedelec: wie zijn de gebruikers? (master’s thesis).

2023

• Climate + Community Project. (2023). Achieving zero emissions with more mobility and less mining. https://www.climateandcommunity.org/_files/ugd/d6378b_3b79520a747948618034a2b19b9481a0.pdf.
• Ben Marner, Tim Williamson, Kate Wilkins et al (2023) Quantifying the impact of low- and zero-emission zones in six European cities for the Clean Cities Campaign and Transport & Environment. Logika Noise Air Quality Consultants. https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/zones-compressed.pdf
• Elisabetta Cornago, Alexandros Dimitropoulos, Walid Oueslati (2023) The impact of urban road pricing on the use of bike sharing. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102821
• Seunghyun Kim a, Changhyeon Song b, Kwangsoo Shin (2023). Factors affecting business performance of e-mobility companies in Korea. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100038
• Mojdeh Azad, William J. Rose, John H. MacArthur et al (2023) E-trikes for urban delivery: An empirical mixed-fleet simulation approach to assess city logistics sustainability. Science Direct https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104641
• Nayak, A.K., Ganguli, B., and Ajayan, P. M. (2023). Advances in electric two-wheeler technologies. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.02.008.

2022

• Arendt, R., Bach, V., and Finkbeiner, M. (2022). Environmental costs of abiotic resource demand for the EU’s low-carbon development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106057.
• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Strömblad, E., Hiselius, L.W., Rosqvist, L.S., and Svensson, H. (2022). A qualitative case study examining individuals’ perceptions of mode choice and the possibility to reduce car mileage for everyday leisure trips. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.09.013.
• Tsavachidis, M., and Le Petit, Y. (2022). Re-shaping urban mobility – Key to Europe´s green transition. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100014.
• Wysling, L., and Purves, R.S. (2022). Where to improve cycling infrastructure? Assessing bicycle suitability and bikeability with open data in the city of Paris. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100648.
• Zhu, R., Kondor, D., and Cheng, C. et al. (2022). Solar photovoltaic generation for charging shared electric scooters. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118728.

2021

• Ferretto, L., Bruzzone, F., and Nocera, S. (2021). Pathways to active mobility planning. Research in Transportation Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101027.
• Ewert, A., Schmid, S., Brost, M., Davies, H., and Vinckx, L. (2021). Small Electric Vehicles: An International View on Light Three- and Four-Wheelers. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65843-4.
• Shaffer, B., Auffhammer, M., & Samaras, C. (2021). Make electric vehicles lighter to maximize climate and safety benefits. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02760-8.
• Slob, W. (2021). How Policy Makers Can Overcome Competing Values in The Pursuit of Solutions to Societal Problems – Light Electric Vehicles in The Dutch Mobility Sector From an Institutional Logics Perspective. Master Thesis. Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/403181.

2020

• Casady, C. B. (2020). Customer-led mobility: A research agenda for Mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) enablement. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.10.009.
• Transport Infrastructure Ireland. (2020). Travelling in a Woman’s Shoes. https://www.tii.ie/technical-services/research/TII-Travelling-in-a-Womans-Shoes-Report_Issue.pdf.

Earlier

• Hanna, P., Kantenbacher, J., Cohen, S., and Gössling, S. (2018). Role model advocacy for sustainable transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.028.
• NatCen Social Research. (2020). Impact of interventions encouraging a switch from cars to more sustainable modes of transport. A rapid evidence assessment. Gov.UK.
• Wang, W., Bengler, K., and Jiang, X. (Eds.). (2018). Green Intelligent Transportation Systems. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3551-7.
• Zuev, D. (2018). Urban Mobility in Modern China: the growth of the E-bike. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76590-7.

2023

• Joris, J. Barde, F. (2023). A critical review of lithium ion battery safety testing and standards. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121014
• Volta Foundation. (2023). Annual Battery Report 2022. https://www.volta.foundation/annual-battery-report.
• Xintong, L., Chunyang, H., Helai, H., et al. (2023). Pursuing higher acceptability and compliance for electric two-wheeler standardization policy in China: The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, psychological factors, and travel habits. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.017.
• Yin, R., and He, J. (2023). Design of a photovoltaic electric bike battery-sharing system in public transit stations. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120505.

2022

• Badgujar, C., and Mohite, S. (2022). Design, analysis and implementation of control moment gyroscope (CMG) mechanism to self-balance a moped bike. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.380.
• Boglietti, S., Ghirardi, T., Zanoni, C.T. et al. (2022). First experimental comparison between e-kick scooters and e-bike’s vibrational dynamics. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.092.
• Li, L., Liu, B., Zheng, W., Wu, X., Song, L., and Dong, W. (2022). Investigation and numerical reconstruction of a full-scale electric bicycle fire experiment in high-rise residential building. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102304.
• Lin, M., Liu, P., Kuo, J., and Lin, Y. (2022). A multiobjective stochastic location-allocation model for scooter battery swapping stations. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102079.
• Mehra, A., Singh, R., Chauhan, A.S. et al. (2022). Design and analysis of an electric bike chassis. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.247.
• Sahwal, C.P., Dinh, T.Q., and Sengupta, S. (2022). Controller development of thermal management system for electric bikes. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.135.
• Septiadi, W.N., Alim, M., and Adi, M.N.P. (2022). The application of battery thermal management system based on heat pipes and phase change materials in the electric bike. Journal of Energy Storage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.106014.
• Shuai, C., Yang, F., Wang, W., Shan, J., Zheng, C., and Xin, O. (2022). Promoting Charging Safety of Electric Bicycles via Machine Learning. iScience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105786.
• Sweeney, S., Lhachemi, H., Mannion, A., Russo, G., and Shorten, R. (2022). Pitchfork-bifurcation-based competitive and collaborative control of an E-bike system. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110595.
• Tang, Y., Zhang, Q., Wen, Z., Bunn D., and Martin, J.N. (2022). Optimal analysis for facility configuration and energy management on electric light commercial vehicle charging. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123363.
• Windisch-Kern, S., Gerold, E., Nigl, T. et al. (2022). Recycling chains for lithium-ion batteries: A critical examination of current challenges, opportunities and process dependencies. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.038.
• Xu, M., Di, Y., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Designing van-based mobile battery swapping and rebalancing services for dockless ebike-sharing systems based on the dueling double deep Q-network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103620.

2021

• Davies, H. C., and Bastien, C. (2021). An Approach for the Crash Safety Assessment of Smaller and Lightweight Vehicles. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.02.009.
• Raji, A., Devaraju, A., Gopi, R., and Venkatesh, R. (2021). Fabrication and mechanical characterization of hybrid composite bike safety helmet. Materialstoday: proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.433.
• Ramanathan, G., and Bharatiraja, C. (2021). Design of mono stage bridgeless converter for light electric vehicles charging. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.230.
• Sivaraman, N., Vaidyanathan, R. M., Patel, M., Woldegiorgis, M. M., and Atiso, T. A. (2021). Performance evaluation of tricycle for differently abled people. Materialstoday: proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.963.

Earlier

• Rodriquez-Rosa, D., Payo-Gutierrez, I., Castillo-Garcia, Gonzalez-Rodriquez, A., and Perez-Juarez, S. (2017). Improving Energy Efficiency of an Autonomous Bicycle with Adaptive Controller Design. Sustainability.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050866.
• Rotthier, B., Stevens G., Dikomitis L., Huyck B., Motoasca E., and Cappelle J. (2017). Typical cruising speed of speed pedelecs and the link with motor power as a result of a Belgian naturalistic cycling study. (Paper No. 12). Presented at the International Cycling Safety Conference, Davis, USA, 20-Sep 2017 / 23-Sep 2017.

2023

• Abouelela, M., Chaniotakis, E., and Antoniou, C. (2023). Understanding the landscape of shared-e-scooters in North America; Spatiotemporal analysis and policy insights. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103602.
• Bach, X., Marquet, O., and Miralles-Guasch, C. (2023). Assessing social and spatial access equity in regulatory frameworks for moped-style scooter sharing services. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.01.002.
• Choi, S.E., Kim, J., and Seo, D. (2023). Travel patterns of free-floating e-bike-sharing users before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104065.
• Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Pamucar, D., Chen, Y., and Coffman, D. (2023). Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based RAFSI model. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104426.
• Echeverría-Su, M., Huamanraime-Maquin, E., Cabrera, F.I., and Vázquez-Rowe, I. (2023). Transitioning to sustainable mobility in Lima, Peru. Are e-scooter sharing initiatives part of the problem or the solution?. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161130.
• Klein, N., Brown, A., and Thigpen, C. (2023). Clutter and Compliance: Scooter Parking Interventions and Perceptions. Active Travel Studies. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.1196.
• Liu, S., Zhang, F., Ji, Y., Ma, X,. et al. (2023). Understanding spatial-temporal travel demand of private and shared e-bikes as a feeder mode of metro stations. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136602.
• Reis, A.F., Baptista, P., and Moura, F (2023). How to promote the environmental sustainability of shared e-scooters: A life-cycle analysis based on a case study from Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100044.
• Savastano, M., Suciu, M-C., Gorelova, I., and Stativă, G-A. (2023). How smart is mobility in smart cities? An analysis of citizens’ value perceptions through ICT applications. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104071.
• Sobrino, N., Gonzalez, J.N., Vassallo, J.M., and de los Angeles Baeza, M. (2023). Regulation of shared electric kick scooters in urban areas: Key drivers from expert stakeholders. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.02.009.
• Yan, X., Zhao, X., Broaddus, A., et al. (2023). Evaluating shared e-scooters’ potential to enhance public transit and reduce driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103640.
• Yin, R., and He, J. (2023). Design of a photovoltaic electric bike battery-sharing system in public transit stations. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120505.
• Zhou, Y., Yu, Y., Wang, Y., Hem B., and Yang, L. (2023). Mode substitution and carbon emission impacts of electric bike sharing systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104312.
• Tuli, F.M., Nithila, A.N., Mitra, S. (2023). Uncovering the Spatio-Temporal Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Shared E-Scooter Usage: A Spatial Panel Model. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100843.

2022

• Angelelli, E., Chiari, M., Mor, A., Speranza, M.G. (2022). A simulation framework for a station-based bike-sharing system. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108489.
• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Chicco, A. and Diana, M. (2022). Understanding micro-mobility usage patterns: a preliminary comparison between dockless bike sharing and e-scooters in the city of Turin (Italy). Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
• Coretti Sanchez, N., Martinez, I., Alonso Pastor, L., and Larson, K. (2022). On the performance of shared autonomous bicycles: A simulation study. Communications in Transportation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100066.
• Fan, Z., and Harper, C.D. (2022). Congestion and environmental impacts of short car trip replacement with micromobility modes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103173.
• Gebhardt, L., Ehrenberger, S., Wolf, C., and Cyganski, R. (2022). Can shared E-scooters reduce CO2 emissions by substituting car trips in Germany? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103328.
• Jiageng, N., Lanlan, Z., and Xianghong, L. (2022). A study on the trip behavior of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Chinese universities based on NL model – Henan Polytechnic University as an example. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127855.
• Jiao, J., Lee, H.K., and Choi, S.J. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on bike-sharing usages in Seoul, South Korea. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103849.
• Krauss, K., Krail, M. and Axhausen, K. W. (2022). What drives the utility of shared transport services for urban travellers? A stated preference survey in German cities. Travel behaviour and society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010.
• Krier, C., Dablanc, L., Aguiléra, A., and Louvet, N. (2022). Sharing within the gig economy: The use of shared e-bikes by on-demand platform-based instant meal delivery workers in Paris. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.012.
• Leurent, F. (2022). What is the value of swappable batteries for a shared e-scooter service? Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100843.
• Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
• Liu, H-C., Lin, J-J. (2022). Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.012.
• Li, H., Yuan, Z., and Novack, T., et al. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
• Ma, Q., Xin, Y., Yang, H., and Xie, K. (2022). Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103376.
• Martin, R., and Xu, Y. (2022). Is tech-enhanced bikeshare a substitute or complement for public transit? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.007.
• Mouratidis, K. (2022). Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104161.
• Shao, Q., Zhang, W., Cao, X., and Yang J. (2022). Nonlinear and interaction effects of land use and motorcycles/E-bikes on car ownership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103115.
• Sun, S. and Ertz, M. (2022). Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions: Evidence from urban transportation big data. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104045.
• Teixeira, J. F., Silva, C., and Moura e Sá, M. (2022). The strengths and weaknesses of bike sharing as an alternative mode during disruptive public health crisis: A qualitative analysis on the users’ motivations during COVID-19. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026.
• Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
• Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., and Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468.
• Xiao, G., Xiao, Y., Ni, A., Zhang, C., and Zong, F. (2022). Exploring influence mechanism of bikesharing on the use of public transportation — a case of Shanghai. Transportation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2022.2093287.
• Xu, M., Di, Y., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Designing van-based mobile battery swapping and rebalancing services for dockless ebike-sharing systems based on the dueling double deep Q-network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103620.
• Yang, X., Xu, Y., Zhou, Y., Song, S., and Wu, Y. (2022). Demand-aware mobile bike-sharing service using collaborative computing and information fusion in 5G IoT environment. Digital Communications and Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2022.06.004.
• Yang, H., Zheng, R., Li, X., et al. (2022). Nonlinear and threshold effects of the built environment on e-scooter sharing ridership. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103453.
• Zhou, X., Ji, Y., Yuan, Y., Zhang, F., and An, Q. (2022). Spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of commuting by shared electric bike: A case study of Ningbo, China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132337.
• Zhu, Z., and Lu, C. (2022). Life cycle assessment of shared electric bicycle on greenhouse gas emissions in China. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160546

2021

• Brand, C., Dons, E., Anaya-Boig, Avila-Palencia, I., et al. (2021). The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102764.
• Chen, W., Chen, X., Chen, J., and Cheng, L. (2021). What factors influence ridership of station-based bike sharing and free-floating bike sharing at rail transit stations?. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1872121.
• Cities Multimodal, Interreg Baltic Sea Region, & European Regional Development Fund (2021). Toolbox for Mobility Management. Eltis, The Urban Mobility Observatory. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/trainingmaterials/tr_toolbox_layout_v19.pdf.
• Clean Cities& YouGov. (2021). What European city-dwellers want from their mayors post-Covid – Survey. https://cleancitiescampaign.org/2021/05/04/what-city-dwellers-want-from-their-mayors-post-covid/.
• Cottell, J., Connelly, K., and Harding, C. (2021). Micromobility in London. Centre for London. Micromobility_in_London_Report.pdf (centreforlondon.org).
• Dev Mukku, V., Haj Salah, I. and Assmann, T. (2021). Simulation Testbed for the next-generation Bike-Sharing System with Self-driving Cargo-Bikes. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.129.
• European Parliament, TRAN-committee. (2021). Sustainable and smart urban transport. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2021/652233/IPOL_ATA(2021)652233_EN.pdf.
• Frias-Martinez, V., Sloate, E., Manglunia, H., and Wu, J. (2021). Causal effect of low-income areas on shared dockless e-scooter use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103038.
• Fukushige, T., Fitch, T. D., and Handy, S. (2021). Factors influencing dock-less E-bike-share mode substitution: Evidence from Sacramento, California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102990.
• Fung, C. M., McArthur, D. P., and Hong, J. (2021). Examining the effects of a temporary subway closure on cycling in Glasgow using bike-sharing data. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.06.002.
• Guo, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Understanding factors influencing shared e-scooter usage and its impact on auto mode substitution. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102991.
• Hosseinzadeh, Karimpour and Kluger (2021). Factors influencing shared micromobility services: An analysis of e-scooters and bikeshare. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103047.
• Hu, J-W., and Creutzig, F. (2021). A systematic review on shared mobility in China. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1879974.
• Latinopoulos, C., Patrier, A., and Sivakumar, A. (2021). Planning for e-scooter use in metropolitan cities: A case study for Paris. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103037.
• Lipovsky, C. (2021). Free-floating electric scooters: representation in French mainstream media. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1809752.
• Maltese, I., Gatta, V., and Marcucci, E. (2021). Active Travel in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. An Italian overview. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100621.
• Rejali, S., Aghabayk, K., Mohammadi, A., and Shiwakoti, N. (2021). Assessing a priori acceptance of shared dockless e-scooters in Iran. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103042.
• Sadeghinasr, B. et al. (2021). Mining dockless bikeshare data for insights into cyclist behaviour and preferences: Evidence from the Boston region. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103044.
• Tan, X., Zhu, X., Li, Q., Li, L., and Chen, J. (2021). Tidal phenomenon of the dockless bike-sharing system and its causes: the case of Beijing. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1871129.
• Yang, Y., Jiang, L., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Tourists on shared bikes: Can bike-sharing boost attraction demand? Tourism Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104328.
• Zhao, Y., and Ke, J. (2021). The impact of shared mobility services on housing values near subway stations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103097.

2020

• Dill, J., and McNeil, N. (2020). Are Shared Vehicles Shared by All? A Review of Equity and Vehicle Sharing. Journal of Planning Literature. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220966732.
• Hosseinzadeh, A., Algomaiah, M., Kluger, R., and Li, Z. (2020). E-scooters and Sustainability: Investigating the Relationship between the Density of E-Scooter Trips and Characteristics of Sustainable Urban Development. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624.
• Lozzi, G., Rodrigues, M., Marcucci, E., Teoh, T., Gatta, V., and Pacelli, V. (2020). Research for TRAN Committee – COVID-19 and urban mobility: impacts and perspectives, European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_IDA(2020)652213.