LEV research

LEV Research

2022
2021
Earlier
  • Arnold, F., Cardenas, I., Sörensen, K., and Dewulf, W. (2018, revised). Simulation of B2C e-commerce distribution in Antwerp using cargo bikes and delivery points. European Transport Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0272-6.
  • Assmann, T., and Behrendt, F. (2017). Determining optimal container heights for cargobike crossdocking schemes in urban areas. Conference: 10th International Doctoral Students Workshop on Logistics, At Magdeburg, Germany.
  • Hofmann, W., Assmann, T., Neghabadi, P. D., Cung, V.D., and Tolujevs, J.  (2017). A Simulation Tool to Assess the Integration of Cargo Bikes into an Urban Distribution System. Conference: The 5th International Workshop on Simulation for Energy, Sustainable Development & Environment, At Barcelona, Spain. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01875988.
  • Landesinstitut Für Arbeitsgestaltung. Good vibrations? Unterschätztes Risiko von Vibrationen bei Lastenpedelecs. Retrieved from https://www.lia.nrw.de/service/publikationen-downloads/LIA_fakten/index.html.
  • Melo, S., and Baptista, P. (2017). Evaluating the impacts of using cargo cycles on urban logistics:integrating traffic, environmental and operational boundaries. European Transport Research Reviewhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0246-8.

2022
2021
  • Alessio, H. M., Reiman, T., Kemper, B., Von Carlowitz, W., Bailer, A. J., and Timmerman, K. (2021). Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Simulated Commute on an E-Bike. Translational Journal of the ACSM. https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000155.
  • Anderson, A., Adell, E., and Hiselius, L. W. (2021). What is the substitution effect of e-bikes? A randomised controlled trial. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102648.
  • Deakin, N. L. (2021). Recognising the physical and social characteristics of urban cycling environments (PHD). Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/0b2cb8ed-3d15-4b65-9c1f-2bbd61ba8be1.
  • Hallberg, M., Rasmussen, T. K., and Rich, J. (2021). Modelling the impact of cycle superhighways and electric bicycles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.015.
  • Mitterwallner, V., Steinbauer, P. M., Besold, A., et al. (2021). Electrically assisted mountain biking: Riding faster, higher, farther in natural mountain systems. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100448.
  • Rérat, P. (2021). The rise of the e-bike: Towards an extension of the practice of cycling? Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1897236.
  • Stilo, L., Segura-Velandia, D., Lugo, H., Conway, P. P., and West, A. A. (2021). Electric bicycles, next generation low carbon transport systems: A survey. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100347.
  • Tscharaktschiew, S., & Müller, S. (2021). Ride to the hills, ride to your school: Physical effort and mode choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102983.
2020
  • Bourne, J, E., Cooper, A, R., Kelly, P., Kinnear, F, J., England, C., Leary, S., and Page, A. (2020). The impact of e-cycling on travel behaviour: A scoping review. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100910.
  • Fyhri, A., and Sundfør, H., B. (2020). Do people who buy e-bikes cycle more? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102422.
  • Hasnine, S., Dianat, A., and Nurul Habib, K. (2020). Investigating the factors affecting the distance travel and health conditions of e-bike users in Toronto. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100265.
  • Kazemzadeh, K., and Ronchi, E. (2020). From bike to electric bike level-of-service. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1900450.
  • McQueen, M., MacArthur, J., and Cherry, C. (2020). The e-bike potential: estimating regional e-bike impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. Transport Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102482.
Earlier
  • Astegiano, P., Tampere, C., Mayeres, I., and Himpe. (2017). Electric Cycling in Flanders: Empirical Research into the Functional Use of the e-Bike. KU Leuven. KU Leuven.
  • Behrendt, F. (2015). Why cycling matters for electric mobility: towards diverse, active and sustainable e-mobilities. Mobilities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1335463.
  • Berntsen, S., Malnes, L., Langaker, A., and Bere, E. (2017). Physical activity when riding an electric assisted bicycle. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0513-z.
  • Fishman, E., & Cherry, C. (2015). E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907.
  • Fyhri, A., Heinen, E., Fearnley, N., amd Sundfør, H.B. (2017). A push to cycling—exploring the e-bike’s role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1302526.
  • Huertas-Leyva, P., Dozzal, M., and Baldanzini, N. (2019). E-bikers’ braking behavior: Results from a naturalistic cycling study. Traffic Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1643015.
  • Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid (KiM). (2019). Gebruik van e-fiets en effecten op andere vervoerwijzen. https://www.kimnet.nl/publicaties/rapporten/2019/12/02/gebruik-van-e-fiets-en-effecten-op-andere-vervoerwijzen.
  • Ling, Z., Cherry,. MacArthur, J. H., and Weinert, X. J. (2017). Differences of Cycling Experiences and Perceptions between E-Bike and Bicycle Users in the United States. Sustainabilityhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su9091662.
  • Liu, Y., Ji, Y., Liu, Q., and He, M. (2017). Investigating electric bicycles as a travel mode choice for escorting children to school. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Boardhttps://doi.org/10.3141/2634-02.
  • Salmerón-Manzano, E., and Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018). The Electric Bicycle: Worldwide Research Trends. Energieshttps://doi.org/10.3390/en11071894.
  • Plazier, P. A., Weitkamp, G., and van den Berg, A. E. (2017). “Cycling was never so easy!” An analysis of e-bike commuters’ motives, travel behaviour and experiences using GPS-tracking and interviews. Journal of Transport Geographyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.09.017.
  • Plazier, P. A., Weitkamp, G., and van den Berg, A. E. (2017). The potential for e-biking among the younger population: A study of Dutch students. Travel Behaviour and Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.04.007.
  • Plazier, P., van den Berg, A. E., and Weitkamp, G. (2016). Commuting by e-bike: a mixed methods approach. RGS-IBG Conference, London, United Kingdom.
2022
2020
  • Eccarius, T. and Lu, C.C. (2020). Powered two-wheelers for sustainable mobility: A review of consumer adoption of electric motorcycles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1540735.
Earlier
  • Koossalapeerom, T., Satiennam, T., Satiennam, Leelapatra, W., Seedam, A., and Rakpukdee, T. (2019). Comparative study of real-world driving cycles, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions of electric and gasoline motorcycles driving in a congested urban corridor. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.031.
  • Xuan, P. Y., Henz, M., & Weigl. (2013). Environmental impact of Converted Electrical Motorcycle. 2013 World Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exhibition (EVS27) https://doi.org/10.1109/EVS.2013.6914813.
2022
  • Bascones, K., Maio Méndez, T.E., and Yañez Siller, F.A. (2022). E-scooter accidents: A new epidemic. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.02.001.
  • Blazanin, G., Mondal, A., Asmussen, K.E., and Bhat, C.R. (2022). E-scooter sharing and bikesharing systems: An individual-level analysis of factors affecting first-use and use frequency. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103515.
  • Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
  • Bodansky, D.M.S., Gach, M.W., Grant, M. et al. (2022). Legalisation of e-scooters in the UK: the injury rate and pattern is similar to those of bicycles in an inner city metropolitan area. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.016.
  • Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., and Pamucar, D. et al. (2022). Safe E-scooter operation alternative prioritization using a q-rung orthopair Fuzzy Einstein based WASPAS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131239.
  • Foissaud, N., Gioldasis, C., Tamura, S., Christoforou, Z., and Farhi, N. (2022). Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas: A spatiotemporal analysis. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103335.
  • Javadinasr, M., Asgharpour, S., Rahimi, E., et al. (2022). Eliciting attitudinal factors affecting the continuance use of E-scooters: An empirical study in Chicago. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.019.
  • Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
  • Liazos, A., Iliopoulou, C., Kepaptsoglou, K., and Bakogiannis, E. (2022). Geofence planning for electric scooters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103149.
  • Öztaş Karlı, R.G., Karlı, H., and Çelikyay, H.S. (2022). Investigating the acceptance of shared e-scooters: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.03.018.
  • Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
  • Wang, K., Qian, X., Fitch, D.T. et al. (2022). What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639.
  • Yang, H., Bao, Y., Huo, J., et al. (2022). Impact of road features on shared e-scooter trip volume: A study based on multiple membership multilevel model. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.005.
  • Zhu, R., Kondor, D., and Cheng, C. et al. (2022). Solar photovoltaic generation for charging shared electric scooters. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118728.
  • Zuniga-Garcia, N., Tec, M., Scott, J.G., and Machemehl, R.B. (2022). Evaluation of e-scooters as transit last-mile solution. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103660.
2021
2020
  • Sanders, R. L., Branion-Calles, M., and Nelson, T. A. (2020). To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A: policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009.
  • Severengiz, S., Finke, S., Schelte, N., and Wendt, N. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment on the Mobility Service E-Scooter Sharing. 2020 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit. 10.1109/E-TEMS46250.2020.9111817.
2022
  • Aurora, F., Cove, G., Sandhu, P., Gormley, M., and Thomas, S. (2022). Oral and maxillofacial injuries from electric scooters in Bristol; a retrospective observational study. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.12.031.
  • Bascones, K., Maio Méndez, T.E., and Yañez Siller, F.A. (2022). E-scooter accidents: A new epidemic. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.02.001.
  • Bodansky, D.M.S., Gach, M.W., Grant, M. et al. (2022). Legalisation of e-scooters in the UK: the injury rate and pattern is similar to those of bicycles in an inner city metropolitan area. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.016.
  • Chang, F. et al. (2022). Crash injury severity of E-Bike Riders: A random parameters generalized ordered probit model with heterogeneity in means. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105545.
  • Liu, Y., Wan, X., et al. (2022). A novel approach to investigate effects of front-end structures on injury response of e-bike riders: Combining Monte Carlo sampling, automatic operation, and data mining. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106599.
  • Van Cauwenberg, J., Schepers, P., Deforche, B., and de Geus, B. (2022). Effects of e-biking on older adults’ biking and walking frequencies, health, functionality and life space area: A prospective observational study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.12.006.
2021
  • Aldred, R., Woodcock, J., and Goodman, A. (2021). Major investment in active travel in Outer London: Impacts on travel behaviour, physical activity, and health. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100958.
  • Alessio, H., Reiman, T., Kemper, B., Von Carlowitz, W., Bailer, A. J., and Timmerman, K. L. (2021). Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Simulated Commute on an E-Bike. Translational Journal of the ACSM. https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000155.
  • Kazemzadeh, K., and Koglin, T. (2021). Electric bike (non)users’ health and comfort concerns pre and peri a world pandemic (COVID-19): A qualitative study. Journal of Transport & Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101014.
  • Macharis, C., Tori, S., de Séjournet, A., Keseru, I., and Vanhaverbeke, L. (2021). Can the COVID-19 Crisis be a Catalyst for Transition to Sustainable Urban Mobility? Assessment of the Medium- and Longer-Term Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Mobility in Brussels. Frontiers in Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.725689.
  • Wild, K., Woodward, A., and Shaw, C. (2021). Gender and the E-bike: Exploring the Role of Electric Bikes in Increasing Women’s Access to Cycling and Physical Activity, Active Travel Studies. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.991.
Earlier
  • Berntsen, S., Malnes, L., Langåker, A., and Bere, E. (2017). Physical activity when riding an electric assisted bicycle. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activityhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0513-z.
  • Boele-Vos, M. J., Commandeur, J. J. F., and Twisk, D. A. M. (2017). Effect of physical effort on mental workload of cyclists in real traffic in relation to age and use of pedelecs. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.025.
  • Bourne, J. E., Sauchelli, S., Perry, R., Page, A., Leary, S., England, C., and Cooper, R. A. (2018). Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8.
  • Castro, A., Gaupp-Berghausen, M., Dons, E., Standaert, A., et al. (2019). Physical activity of electric bicycle users compared to conventional bicycle users and non-cyclists: Insights based on health and transport data from an online survey in seven European cities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100017.
  • Hall, C., Hoj, T. H., Clark, J., Geoff, W., Chaney, R. A., Crookston, B., and West, J. (2019). Pedal-Assist Mountain Bikes: A Pilot Study Comparison of the Exercise Response, Perceptions, and Beliefs of Experienced Mountain Bikers. JMIR Formative Researchhttps://doi.org/10.2196/13643.
  • Höchsmann, C., Meister, S., Gehrig, D., et al. (2018). Effect of E-Bike Versus Bike Commuting on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Overweight Adults: A 4-Week Randomized Pilot Study. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000438.
  • Langford, B.C., Cherry, C., Bassett Jr, D., Fitzhugh, E., and Dhaka, N. (2017). Comparing physical activity of pedal-assist electric bikes with walking and conventional bicycles.  Journal of Transporthttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.002.
  • Stokols, D., Novaco, R. W., Stokols, J., and Campbell, J. (1978). Traffic congestion, Type A behavior, and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.63.4.467.
  • Peterman, J.E., Morris, K.L., Kram, R., and Byrnes, C. W. (2016). Pedelecs as a physically active transportation mode. European Journal of Applied Physiologyhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3408-9.
  • Sundfør, H. B., and Fyhri, A. (2017). A push for public health: the effect of e-bikes on physical activity levels. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4817-3.
  • Twisk, D. A. M., Platteel, S., and Lovegrove, G. R. (2017). An experiment on rider stability while mounting: Comparing middle-aged and elderly cyclists on pedelecs and conventional bicycles.  Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.004.
  • Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Yang, J. et al. (2018). Road traffic injuries among riders of electric bike/electric moped in southern China. Traffic Injury Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1423681.
2021
2020
  • Tsakalidis, A., Krause, J., Julea, A., Peduzzi, E., Pisoni, E., and Thiel, C. (2020). Electric light commercial vehicles: Are they the sleeping giant of electromobility? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102421.
Earlier
  • Huang, F.H. (2019). Understanding user acceptance of battery swapping service of sustainable transport: An empirical study of a battery swap station for electric scooters, Taiwan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1547464.
  • Oliveira, C. M., Bandeira, R. A., Goes, G. V., Goncalves, D. N. S., and D’Agosto, M. (2017). Sustainable Vehicles-Based Alternatives in Last Mile Distribution of Urban Freight Transport: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081324.
  • Ploos van Amstel, W., Balm, S., Warmerdam, J., Boerema, M., et al. (2018). City logistics: Light and electric: LEFV-logic: research on light electric freight vehicles. Faculty of Technology: Vol. 13. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. https://www.dropbox.com/s/jtynb22ir25ygj9/lefv-logic.english.pdf?dl=0 .
2022
  • Murugan, M. and Marisamynathan, S. (2022). Mode shift behaviour and user willingness to adopt the electric two-wheeler: A study based on Indian road user preferences. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.03.008.
2021
Earlier
  • Arsenio, E., Dias, J. V., Lopes, S. A., and Pereira, H. I. (2018). Assessing the market potential of electric bicycles and ICT for low carbon school travel: a case study in the Smart City of ÁGUEDA. European Transport Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0279-z.
2022
  • Adjei, F., Cimador, T., Severengiz, S. (2022). Electrically powered micro mobility vehicles in Ghana: transition process with a focus on social acceptance. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.02.127.
  • Chicco, A. and Diana, M. (2022). Understanding micro-mobility usage patterns: a preliminary comparison between dockless bike sharing and e-scooters in the city of Turin (Italy). Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
  • Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Cocuzza, E. et al. (2022). Developing micromobility in urban areas: network planning criteria for e-scooters and electric micromobility devices. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.058.
  • Medina-Molina, C., Pérez-Macías, N., and Gismera-Tierno, L. (2022). The multi-level perspective and micromobility services. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100183.
  • Reck, J. D., Martin, H., and Axhausen, K. W. (2022). Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103134.
  • Torabi, K., Araghi, Y., van Oort, N., and Hoogendoorn, S. (2022). Passengers preferences for using emerging modes as first/last mile transport to and from a multimodal hub case study Delft Campus railway station. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.12.011.
2021
2020
2022
  • Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., and Njoya, E.T. (2022). Mobility as a service (MaaS): A thematic map of challenges and opportunities. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100783.
  • Labee, P., Rasouli, S., and Liao, F. (2022). The implications of Mobility as a Service for urban emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103128.
  • Lindkvist, H., and Melander, L. (2022). How sustainable are urban transport services? A comparison of MaaS and UCC. Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100829.
  • Smith, G., Sochor, J., and Karlsson, I.C.M. (2022). Adopting Mobility-as-a-Service: An empirical analysis of end-users’ experiences. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.001.
2021
  • Arias-Molinares, D., Julio, R., García-Palomares, J.C., and Gutiérrez, J. (2021). Exploring micromobility services: Characteristics of station-based bike-sharing users and their relationship with dockless services. Journal of Urban Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100010.
  • Hensher, D. A., Mulley, C., and Nelson, J. D. (2021). Mobility as a service (MaaS) – Going somewhere or nowhere? Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.021.
2020
  • Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid. (2020). Kansrijke verplaatsingen met Mobility-as-a-Service. ISBN/EAN: 978-90-8902-240-0.
  • Zhao, X., Vaddadi, B., Sjöman, M., Hesselgren, M., & Pernestal, A. (2020). Key barriers in MaaS development and implementation: Lessons learned from testing Corporate MaaS (CMaaS). Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100227.
  • Zijlstra, T., Durand, A., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., & Harms, L. (2020). Early adopters of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Netherlands. Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.07.019.
  • Active Travel Academy: brings together a broad spectrum of expertise to lead research with a focus on walking and cycling, use of other ‘micromobilities’ from e-scooters to electric hand cycles; and reduction in car use
  • FERSI: The Forum of European Road Safety Research Institutes
  • HVA: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences Faculty of Technology
  • KU Leuven: ELECTA, this research division covers the broad spectrum of electrical energy systems and robust control of industrial systems
  • LEVER: The Light Electric Vehicle Education and Research (LEVER) Initiative
  • VUB Brussels: MOBI, the mobility, logistics and automotive technology research centre 
2022
2021
Earlier
  • Hertach, P., Uhr, A., Niemann, S., and Cavegn, M. (2018). Characteristics of single-vehicle crashes with e-bikes in Switzerland. Accident Analysis & Preventionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.021.
2022
  • Herteleer, B., Van den Steen, N., Vanhaverbeke, L., and Cappelle, J. (2022). Analysis of initial speed pedelec usage for commuting purposes in Flanders. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100589.
2021
  • Stelling, A., Vlakveld, W., and Twisk, D. (2021). Influencing factors of observed speed and rule compliance of speed-pedelec riders in high volume cycling areas: Implications for safety and legislation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106239.
  • Twisk, D., Stelling, A., Van Gent, P., De Groot, J., and Vlakveld, W. (2021). Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105940.
  • Vlakveld, W., Mons, C., Kamphuis, K., Stelling, A., and Twisk, D. (2021). Traffic conflicts involving speed-pedelecs (fast electric bicycles): A naturalistic riding study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106201.
Earlier
2022
2021
2020
Earlier
  • Hanna, P., Kantenbacher, J., Cohen, S., and Gössling, S. (2018). Role model advocacy for sustainable transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.028.
  • NatCen Social Research. (2020). Impact of interventions encouraging a switch from cars to more sustainable modes of transport. A rapid evidence assessment. Gov.UK.
  • Wang, W., Bengler, K., and Jiang, X. (Eds.). (2018). Green Intelligent Transportation Systems. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3551-7.
  • Zuev, D. (2018). Urban Mobility in Modern China: the growth of the E-bike. Palgrave Macmillan, Chamhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76590-7.
2022
  • Boglietti, S., Ghirardi, T., Zanoni, C.T. et al. (2022). First experimental comparison between e-kick scooters and e-bike’s vibrational dynamics. Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.092.
  • Lin, M., Liu, P., Kuo, J., and Lin, Y. (2022). A multiobjective stochastic location-allocation model for scooter battery swapping stations. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102079.
  • Mehra, A., Singh, R., Chauhan, A.S. et al. (2022). Design and analysis of an electric bike chassis. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.247.
  • Tang, Y., Zhang, Q., Wen, Z., Bunn D., and Martin, J.N. (2022). Optimal analysis for facility configuration and energy management on electric light commercial vehicle charging. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123363.
  • Windisch-Kern, S., Gerold, E., Nigl, T. et al. (2022). Recycling chains for lithium-ion batteries: A critical examination of current challenges, opportunities and process dependencies. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.11.038.
  • Xu, M., Di, Y., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Designing van-based mobile battery swapping and rebalancing services for dockless ebike-sharing systems based on the dueling double deep Q-network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103620.
2021
Earlier
  • Rodriquez-Rosa, D., Payo-Gutierrez, I., Castillo-Garcia, Gonzalez-Rodriquez, A., and Perez-Juarez, S. (2017). Improving Energy Efficiency of an Autonomous Bicycle with Adaptive Controller Design. Sustainability.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050866.
  • Rotthier, B., Stevens G., Dikomitis L., Huyck B., Motoasca E., and Cappelle J. (2017). Typical cruising speed of speed pedelecs and the link with motor power as a result of a Belgian naturalistic cycling study. (Paper No. 12). Presented at the International Cycling Safety Conference, Davis, USA, 20-Sep 2017 / 23-Sep 2017.
2022
  • Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
  • Chicco, A. and Diana, M. (2022). Understanding micro-mobility usage patterns: a preliminary comparison between dockless bike sharing and e-scooters in the city of Turin (Italy). Transportation Research Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.057.
  • Fan, Z., and Harper, C.D. (2022). Congestion and environmental impacts of short car trip replacement with micromobility modes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103173.
  • Krauss, K., Krail, M. and Axhausen, K. W. (2022). What drives the utility of shared transport services for urban travellers? A stated preference survey in German cities. Travel behaviour and society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.09.010.
  • Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
  • Martin, R., and Xu, Y. (2022). Is tech-enhanced bikeshare a substitute or complement for public transit? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.007.
  • Shao, Q., Zhang, W., Cao, X., and Yang J. (2022). Nonlinear and interaction effects of land use and motorcycles/E-bikes on car ownership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103115.
  • Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
  • Xu, M., Di, Y., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Designing van-based mobile battery swapping and rebalancing services for dockless ebike-sharing systems based on the dueling double deep Q-network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103620.
2021
2020
Campaign success

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Member profile

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.