2023

• Kazemzadeh, K., Haghani, M., and Sprei, F. (2023). Electric scooter safety: An integrative review of evidence from transport and medical research domains. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104313.

2022

• Altintasi, O., and Yalcinkaya, S. (2022). Siting charging stations and identifying safe and convenient routes for environmentally sustainable e-scooter systems. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104020.
• Ayyildiz, E. (2022). A novel pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology for e-scooter charging station location-selection. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103459.
• Bascones, K., Maio Méndez, T.E., and Yañez Siller, F.A. (2022). E-scooter accidents: A new epidemic. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.02.001.
• Blazanin, G., Mondal, A., Asmussen, K.E., and Bhat, C.R. (2022). E-scooter sharing and bikesharing systems: An individual-level analysis of factors affecting first-use and use frequency. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103515.
• Brauner, T., Heumann, M., Kraschewski, T., et al. (2022). Web content mining analysis of e-scooter crash causes and implications in Germany. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106833.
• Brost, M., Ehrenberger, E., Dasgupta, I., Hahn, R., and Gebhardt, L. (2022). The Potential of Light Electric Vehicles for Climate Protection Through Substitution for Passenger Car Trips – Germany as a case study. German Aerospace Center (DLR) Prepared for LEVA-EU. https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0sbnfd88e49ip3/2022-03-15_LEV4Climate_DLR_report.pdf?dl=0.
• Bodansky, D.M.S., Gach, M.W., Grant, M. et al. (2022). Legalisation of e-scooters in the UK: the injury rate and pattern is similar to those of bicycles in an inner city metropolitan area. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.016.
• Choi, S., Kwak, K., Yang, S., Lim, S., and Woo, JR. (2022). Effects of policy instruments on electric scooter adoption in Jakarta, Indonesia: A discrete choice experiment approach. Economic Analysis and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.015.
• Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., and Pamucar, D. et al. (2022). Safe E-scooter operation alternative prioritization using a q-rung orthopair Fuzzy Einstein based WASPAS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131239.
• Esztergár-Kiss, D., Tordai, D., and Lopez Lizarraga, J.C. (2022). Assessment of travel behavior related to e-scooters using a stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.11.010.
• Foissaud, N., Gioldasis, C., Tamura, S., Christoforou, Z., and Farhi, N. (2022). Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas: A spatiotemporal analysis. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103335.
• Gebhardt, L., Ehrenberger, S., Wolf, C., and Cyganski, R. (2022). Can shared E-scooters reduce CO2 emissions by substituting car trips in Germany? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103328.
• Heydari, S., Forrest, M., Preston, J. (2022). Investigating the association between neighbourhood characteristics and e-scooter safety. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103982.
• Javadinasr, M., Asgharpour, S., Rahimi, E., et al. (2022). Eliciting attitudinal factors affecting the continuance use of E-scooters: An empirical study in Chicago. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.019.
• Karpinski, E., Bayles, E., Daigle, L., and Mantine, D. (2022). Comparison of motor-vehicle involved e-scooter fatalities with other traffic fatalities. Journal of Safety Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.008.
• Kazemzadeh, K., and Sprei, F. (2022). Towards an electric scooter level of service: A review and framework. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.06.005.
• Kimpton, A., Loginova, J., Pojani, D., et al. (2022). Weather to scoot? How weather shapes shared e-scooter ridership patterns. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103439.
• Leoni, J., Tanelli, M., Strada, S.C., and Savaresi, S.M. (2022). Assessing e-scooters safety and drivability: a quantitative analysis. IFAC-PapersOnLine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.294.
• Leurent, F. (2022). What is the value of swappable batteries for a shared e-scooter service? Research in Transportation Business & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100843.
• Li, H., Yuan, Z., Novack, T., Huang, W., and Zipf, A. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
• Li, A., Zhao, P., and Liu, X. et al. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103229.
• Li, H., Yuan, Z., and Novack, T., et al. (2022). Understanding spatiotemporal trip purposes of urban micro-mobility from the lens of dockless e-scooter sharing. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101848.
• Liazos, A., Iliopoulou, C., Kepaptsoglou, K., and Bakogiannis, E. (2022). Geofence planning for electric scooters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103149.
• Ma, Q., Xin, Y., Yang, H., and Xie, K. (2022). Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103376.
• McQueen, M., and Clifton, k.j. (2022). Assessing the perception of E-scooters as a practical and equitable first-mile/last-mile solution. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.021.
• Mouratidis, K. (2022). Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104161.
• Öztaş Karlı, R.G., Karlı, H., and Çelikyay, H.S. (2022). Investigating the acceptance of shared e-scooters: Empirical evidence from Turkey. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.03.018.
• Suominen, E., Sajanti, A., Silver, E. et al. (2022). Alcohol intoxication and lack of helmet use are common in Electric Scooter related Traumatic Brain Injuries: a consecutive patient series from a tertiary university hospital. Brain and Spine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.101553.
• Tokey, A.I., Shioma, S.A., and Jamal, S. (2022). Analysis of spatiotemporal dynamics of e-scooter usage in Minneapolis: Effects of the built and social environment. Multimodal Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2022.100037.
• Tzouras, P.G., Mitropoulos, L., Stavropoulou, E. et al. (2022). Agent-based models for simulating e-scooter sharing services: A review and a qualitative assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.02.001.
• Useche, S.A., O’Hern, S., Gonzalez-Marin, A., et al. (2022). Unsafety on two wheels, or social prejudice? Proxying behavioral reports on bicycle and e-scooter riding safety – A mixed-methods study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.015.
• Vallamsundar, S., Jaikumar, R., Venugopal, M. (2022). Exploring the Spatial-temporal dynamics of travel patterns and air pollution exposure of E-scooters. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103477.
• Wang, K., Qian, X., Fitch, D.T. et al. (2022). What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.2015639.
• Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., and Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468.
• Yang, H., Bao, Y., Huo, J., et al. (2022). Impact of road features on shared e-scooter trip volume: A study based on multiple membership multilevel model. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.04.005.
• Yang, H., Zheng, R., Li, X., et al. (2022). Nonlinear and threshold effects of the built environment on e-scooter sharing ridership. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103453.
• Zhu, R., Kondor, D., and Cheng, C. et al. (2022). Solar photovoltaic generation for charging shared electric scooters. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118728.
• Zuniga-Garcia, N., Tec, M., Scott, J.G., and Machemehl, R.B. (2022). Evaluation of e-scooters as transit last-mile solution. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103660.

2021

• Abouelela, M., Haddad, C. A., and Antoniu, C. (2021). Are young users willing to shift from carsharing to scooter–sharing? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102821.
• Brown, A. (2021). Micromobility, Macro Goals: Aligning scooter parking policy with broader city objectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100508.
• Che, M., Lum, K.M., and Wong, Y.D. (2021). Users’ attitudes on electric scooter riding speed on shared footpath: A virtual reality study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1718252.
• Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena). (2021). E-Scooter-Sharing – eine ganzheitliche Bilanz: Potenziale von E-Scootern für eine nachhaltigere, urbane Mobilität. https://www.dena.de/newsroom/meldungen/studie-e-scooter-sharing/.
• Haworth, Schramm and Twisk (2021). Changes in shared and private e-scooter use in Brisbane, Australia and their safety implications. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106451.
• Jiao, J. (2021). Shared micro-mobility: The rise of and the future of E-scooters. Shared Mobility. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822900-2.00008-1.
• Karlsen, K., and Fyhri, A. (2021). The joy and trouble with e-scooters. Institute of Transport Economics Norwegian Centre for Transport Research. https://www.toi.no/publications/the-joy-and-trouble-with-e-scooters-article36886-29.html.
• Karlsen, K., Johnsson, E., Fyhri, A., and Pokorny, P. (2021). Parking solutions for shared e-scooters. Institute of Transport Economics Norwegian Centre for Transport Research. https://www.toi.no/publications/parking-solutions-for-shared-e-scooters-article36746-29.html.
• Kopplin, S, C., Brand, M, B., and Reichenberger, Y. (2021). Consumer acceptance of shared e-scooters for urban and short-distance mobility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102680.
• Latinopoulos, C., Patrier, A. and Sivakumar, A. (2021). Planning for e-scooter use in metropolitan cities: A case study for Paris. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103037.
• Lipovsky, C. (2021). Free-floating electric scooters: representation in French mainstream media. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1809752.
• Lee, H., Baek, K., Chung, J. H., and Kim, J. (2021). Factors affecting heterogeneity in willingness to use e-scooter sharing services. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102751.
• Lee, J. K., Yun, C. H., and Yun, M. H. (2021). Contextual risk factors in the use of electric kick scooters: An episode sampling inquiry. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105233.
• Leung, A. Burke, M., Kaufman, B., Zu., and Yang, E. (2021). Micromobility and toursit dispersal in Townsville: Do e-scooters help tourists spread out, visit more sites and spend more? Griffith University. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qML5MzWaGrqbHz5QMgg1aElBuktqB9jV/view.
• Ma, Q., Yang, H., Ma, Y., Yang, D., Hu, X., and Xie, K. (2021). Examining municipal guidelines for users of shared E-Scooters in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102710.
• Merlin, L, A., Yan, X., Xu, Y., and Zhao, X. (2021). A segment-level model of shared, electric scooter origins and destinations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102709.
• Mitra, R., and Hess, P. M. (2021). Who are the potential users of shared e-scooters? An examination of socio-demographic, attitudinal and environmental factors. Travel Behaviour and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.12.004.
• Ratan, R., Earle, K., Roesenthal, S., et al. (2021). The (digital) medium of mobility is the message: Examining the influence of e-scooter mobile app perceptions on e-scooter use intent. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100076.
• Siebert, F. W., Ringhand, M., Englert, F., et al. (2021). Braking bad – Ergonomic design and implications for the safe use of shared E-scooters. Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105294.
• Wang, Y., Wu, J., Chen, K., and Liu, P. (2021). Are shared electric scooters energy efficient? Communications in Transportation Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2021.100022.
• Yang, H., Huo, J., Bao, Y., Li, X., Yang, L., and Cherry, C.R. (2021). Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.09.012.
• Yang, X., Yang, W., Zhang, X. et al. (2021). A spatiotemporal analysis of e-scooters’ relationships with transit and station-based bikeshare. Transportation research part D: Transport and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103088.
• Zhang, W., Buehler, R., Broaddus, A., and Sweeney, T. (2021). What type of infrastructures do e-scooter riders prefer? A route choice model. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102761.
• Zuniga-Garcia, N., Ruiz Juri, N., Perrine, A. K., & Machemehl, B. R. (2021). E-scooters in urban infrastructure: understanding sidewalk, bike lane, and roadway usage from trajectory data. Case Studies on Transport Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.004.

2020

• Sanders, R. L., Branion-Calles, M., and Nelson, T. A. (2020). To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using E-scooters for riders and non-riders. Transportation Research Part A: policy and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.009.
• Severengiz, S., Finke, S., Schelte, N., and Wendt, N. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment on the Mobility Service E-Scooter Sharing. 2020 IEEE European Technology and Engineering Management Summit. 10.1109/E-TEMS46250.2020.9111817.