More work needed to improve LEVs as a viable car replacement option
Comments Off on More work needed to improve LEVs as a viable car replacement optionSource: LEVERAGE
As part of the LEVERAGE project, Breda University of Applied Sciences, HAN University of Applied Sciences, and Eindhoven University of Technology have surveyed 2,000 residents in the Dutch regions of North Brabant and Arnhem-Nijmegen on mobility perspectives and habits, such as their consideration of light electric vehicles as a sustainable transportation alternative to the car. The results indicate that although LEVs are being considered more as a viable replacement, policy involvement is recommended to encourage more usage.
E-bikes and other light electric vehicles can help users travel more sustainably; however, from their findings, LEVERAGE researchers have concluded that their impact on car use and ownership remains limited.
Adoption is larger for e-bikes than for other LEVs
From the survey participants, 44% of households reported ownership of at least one e-bike. In regards to modes such as e-scooters, e-steps, and e-microcars, these are used much less, with only 4% of residents using them frequently. Car ownership still accounts for the majority of households, with 81%, making it the most dominant mode of transport by far.
Encouraging effects of LEVs on car usage
For frequent LEV and e-bike users, approximately half of them have decreased their car usage, with 9% and 14% of them respectively having fewer cars in their household.
Micro-electros are being viewed more frequently as a direct replacement for the standard car; from users of these vehicles, 43% are thinking about owning fewer cars.
Positive and negative drivers of LEV selection
From the survey, the main reasons for choosing light electric vehicles are: environmental benefits, enjoyment, and comfort. The primary barriers to choosing the sustainable transportation modes are: cost, bad weather conditions, and safety concerns about other road users. Social acceptance has also been highlighted as playing a role, with the e-microcar scoring low on awareness and social support.
Nearly a quarter of surveyed respondents have indicated that they would like to use small LEVs in the future.
Interest for LEV usage is not only in city areas, but also in less urbanised settings.
Policy encouragement needed
Participants have shown broad support for measures tackling nuisance and traffic safety, like fat bike regulation, for example, which has received 84 to 92% support.
Directive policies, which include higher parking fees or having fewer parking spaces, were met with resistance.
Methods considered the most effective included investment in charging infrastructure, parking facilities, and improving public transportation connections.
Conclusion
The LEVERAGE researchers state that LEVs need to be included in a broader mobility policy alongside good public transport and cycling infrastructure that is high-quality.
The full research report can be accessed online in Dutch.

