LEV schemes could help California achieve clean mobility ambitions
Comments Off on LEV schemes could help California achieve clean mobility ambitionsSource: Smartcities Dive
The US state of California has invested billions of dollars into zero-emission transportation infrastructure projects and offered residents rebates for a range of “Clean Vehicles” – but LEVs have been missing from the mix, and could make access to truly clean transport much more equitable.
LEVs could help bring the aims of California’s ambitious Clean Transportation Program – tackling climate change, reducing petroleum use, greater adoption of zero-emission vehicles, and improving air quality – within the reach of many more citizens. Thousands are currently priced out of incentive schemes, which have prioritised electric and hybrid cars, where even with a rebate, the purchase costs can be prohibitively high. In addition, the systematic adoption of infrastructure upgrades that prioritise active travel would enable LEVs to take a greater share of the travel landscape.
Cost considerations
E-bikes, e-scooters and other LEVs have much lower initial purchase costs than zero-emission cars, and lower running and maintenance costs. They also offer the additional advantages of requiring less space – both for storage, and for travel. However, few incentive schemes have been in place to enable access to LEVs for residents such as students, families and low-income workers, effectively pricing them out of a reliable transport option.
The E-bike Incentive Project offered up to $2,000 towards purchase of e-bikes in a scheme that prioritized lower-income and disadvantaged communities. The application window is currently closed, and the first wave of vouchers were claimed within minutes, clearly indicating strong demand. Another scheme, the Driving Clean Assistance Program, offered grants and loans to eligible citizens towards purchase of zero-emission vehicles, including LEVs.
Incentive schemes in other cities, such as Denver, have been successful in enabling access to e-bikes and cargo bikes. Those who participated in the scheme’s survey reported riding their bikes an average of 26 miles per week, replacing 3.4 round-trip vehicle trips. The scheme employed a sliding scale of voucher value, depending on the applicants’ income status; lower-income recipients who received $1,200 towards an e-bike were the most positively impacted, using their e-bikes almost 50% more than those receiving the standard $400 offered to all residents.
Infrastructure requirements
Investment in a statewide network of separated routes which connect neighbourhoods with schools, jobs and public transport is urged, systematically building on plans already in place in such cities as Los Angeles and San Francisco.

