Tag Archive: cycle to work scheme

  1. UK government might clamp down on cycle-to-work tax perks

    Comments Off on UK government might clamp down on cycle-to-work tax perks

    Source: Cycling Electric, EV Powered, FT

    The UK Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is reported to be considering placing a cap on the amount employees can spend on bikes under the Cycle to Work scheme, as stories of individuals spending large amounts on high-end electric leisure models make headlines.

    The plan has prompted heated discussion in the cycling and wider transport industries, with many highlighting that electric bikes, including cargo models enabling zero-emission family transport, may have a higher price tag than traditional bikes, but are highly effective in providing green commuting options.

    Under the Cycle to Work scheme, employees can purchase a bike and accessories through an interest-free loan via their employer, which they pay back through payroll deductions. When the scheme was introduced in 1999, an upper limit of £1,000 was in place, but this was removed in 2019. The government’s own figures show that the vast majority of purchases made through the scheme come under the £2,000 mark, with only 6% over £2,000.

    The argument and counter-arguments

    A headline-grabbing statement by an unnamed government figure has been countered with insights from cycling and transport industry representatives. The government official said, “Cycle to work should be about helping ordinary commuters switch to greener travel, not giving tax breaks to high earners buying £4,000 e-bikes for weekend rides in the Surrey Hills. Taxpayers shouldn’t be footing the bill for luxury leisure.” The available HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) figures show there were approximately 209,000 scheme claimants in 2023-24 with a baseline cost of £130 million, an increase from 167,000 in 2019-20 with a cost of £55 million.

    Sarah McMonagle, Director of External Affairs at Cycling UK, highlighted the successes of the scheme, while pointing out its current limitations in only being available to PAYE employees, which excludes those such as the self-employed or in less formal working situations. “The Cycle to Work scheme plays a really important role in encouraging people to travel in a healthy and more affordable way – but we need a more progressive plan to support more people on lower incomes, or in unstable work, to cycle. While capping the scheme may sound like a sensible way for Ministers to save money, in reality, it will cost the government a lot more. For every £1 spent on the Cycle to Work scheme, we see over £4 in returns: boosting productivity, reducing sick days, and saving households money.

    “With the popularity of e-bikes and cargo bikes soaring, supporting these trends is not just good for individuals, but for the economy as a whole. Any proposal to cap the scheme must consider people who require higher-cost cycles, such as cargo bikes or assisted cycles for disabled people. If the government is serious about providing equal access to active travel, it needs to tailor the scheme to take into account women, families, those with disabilities and people in lower paid or unstable work.”

    A cycle retailer perspective comes from Will Pearson, co-owner of Pearson Cycles. “Customers are far more likely to consistently use their bikes if they are of a certain quality, reliable and efficient – and that often comes at a higher price tag. The government should leave the scheme alone or, ideally, improve the incentives rather than restrict them.”

    Jamie Milroy, CEO and Founder of cycle-to-work platform Dash, responded with data gleaned from the platform: “Just 1.25% of transactions are for more than £5k, with many including adapted cycles or family/cargo-style bikes.

    “These are the bikes which arguably deliver the highest benefit for the scheme!

    “Let’s also remember the scheme has a powerful self-regulating mechanism in that employers must fund/guarantee employee activity, providing natural checks while allowing discretion for higher value purchases where there’s need.”

  2. Calls for UK government to improve Cycle to Work scheme and disability support

    Comments Off on Calls for UK government to improve Cycle to Work scheme and disability support

    Source: Cycling Electric

    A cross-party parliamentary group of the UK government is advocating for a reform of the salary sacrifice legislation that underpins the Cycle to Work scheme, aiming to eliminate longstanding inequalities embedded in the current system.

    The All-Party Parliamentary Group for Cycling and Walking (APPGCW) has published its findings and recommendations in the Active Travel and Social Justice Report.

    Who currently misses out?

    As it stands, the Cycle to Work scheme is only accessible to those in PAYE employment earning above the minimum wage. This inherently excludes some of the people who could benefit most – such as low-income earners, the self-employed, retirees, and the unemployed.

    Although cycling remains one of the most cost-effective modes of transport both upfront and in the long term, the scheme fails to support the groups who might rely on it the most. Research by Sustrans highlights that 19% of low-income individuals are deterred from cycling due to the expense of purchasing a bicycle or e-bike.

    Moreover, the scheme’s financial benefits scale with income – meaning the more you earn, the more you save – prompting long-standing criticism over its inequitable nature.

    What changes are being proposed?

    Labour MP Fabian Hamilton is leading the push within government for a legislative overhaul.

    Hamilton, who co-chairs the APPGCW, stated:“Walking, wheeling, and cycling should be available to everyone, but right now, too many people are excluded. If we are serious about increasing active travel, we must address the systemic barriers that prevent millions from participating. This report provides clear, actionable solutions to make active travel truly inclusive. We will be working hard in Parliament to push for change.”

    With the launch of the APPGCW’s new report, the group intends to meet with ministers and ensure the issue is included in the Parliamentary agenda.

    Cycle for Health: A new vision

    The updated proposal may see the scheme renamed Cycle for Health, with a wider-reaching remit. The suggested reforms include:

    • Subsidies for e-cycles aimed at low-income individuals
    • Recognition of adapted bicycles as mobility aids under the Motability scheme
    • Expansion of affordable cycle hire programmes
    • A cap on fees for cycle hangar storage

    In light of recent government cuts to disability support, there’s an added focus on ensuring improved access to pedal-assisted mobility devices, especially as these may help disabled people return to work. Critics argue that reducing support without providing viable transport alternatives for disabled people is counterproductive.

    The barriers faced by disabled individuals

    The report emphasises that disabled people are at heightened risk of poverty and face significant obstacles to fair employment and pay.

    It states: “As such, the cost of acquiring mobility aids, including adapted cycles, becomes prohibitive, especially where purchasing or repairing adapted cycles is much more expensive than standard ones. Sustrans’ Disabled Citizens’ Inquiry found that 16% of disabled people cannot access adequate mobility aids to walk or wheel (the figure rises to 27% for non-white disabled people).”

    Though electric bikes and tricycles tailored to disabled users can be expensive, they offer life-changing mobility solutions. However, the current Cycle to Work scheme does little to assist, given that many people are ineligible and that adapted cycles often exceed the scheme’s cost cap. Furthermore, accessible hire options and secure storage for adapted cycles remain severely limited.

    The overarching aim is to ensure that any revised scheme caters to those with disabilities, improving access to e-mobility for those who arguably need it the most.

    Additional proposals beyond the scheme

    While reforming the Cycle to Work scheme is a key element of the report, the parliamentary group has tabled a number of additional proposals aimed at improving inclusive transport more broadly:

    • Pavement parking: Urging the government to advance its pavement parking legislation by responding to public consultation and making pavement parking a civil offence. This would empower local authorities to enforce penalties and ensure pavements are accessible for disabled people, parents with prams, and other pedestrians.
    • Cycle training: Making cycle training universally available, with consistent funding and instructors representing a wide range of communities.
    • Inclusive infrastructure: Establishing inclusive design standards as a legal minimum to meet mobility needs for all.
    • Removing barriers: Setting targets to eliminate restrictive barriers on public cycleways, footpaths, parks, and other spaces. This would especially benefit cargo bike users, while also tightening enforcement against anti-social motorcycle use.
    • Grassroots support: Providing sustained funding to local authorities to support community organisations that promote inclusive transport solutions.

    Click here to read the full report.